From: Raphael Gallais-Pou <raphael.gallais-pou@foss.st.com>
To: Alexandre TORGUE <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Cc: <linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>,
Yannick Fertre <yannick.fertre@foss.st.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>,
<kernel@dh-electronics.com>, Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>,
<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Philippe Cornu <philippe.cornu@foss.st.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] dt-bindings: display: st,stm32-dsi: Remove unnecessary fields
Date: Tue, 30 May 2023 15:38:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <af31ae21-2711-2fac-e885-b3bbbcb12be8@foss.st.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <92d5a699-9f5d-2e40-ca73-4604f3e5a657@foss.st.com>
On 5/30/23 15:30, Alexandre TORGUE wrote:
> On 5/30/23 14:27, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On Mon, 29 May 2023 11:13:57 +0200, Raphael Gallais-Pou wrote:
>>> "#address-cells" and "#size-cells" are two properties that are not
>>> mandatory. For instance, the DSI could refer to a bridge outside the scope
>>> of the node rather than include a 'panel@0' subnode. By doing so, address
>>> and size fields become then unnecessary, creating a warning at build time.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Raphael Gallais-Pou <raphael.gallais-pou@foss.st.com>
>>> Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
>>> Reviewed-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
>>> ---
>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/st,stm32-dsi.yaml | 2 --
>>> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>
>> Running 'make dtbs_check' with the schema in this patch gives the
>> following warnings. Consider if they are expected or the schema is
>> incorrect. These may not be new warnings
> I checked it before merging the series on stm32-next tree. I didn't get this
> error. I didn't check commit per commit.
>
> Do you get this error after merging the whole series ?
I think this is because of the order of the patches within the serie. The patch
correcting the yaml is before those modifying the device-trees. This could
explain warnings rise up when checking patch per patch. However I did not get
any errors on top of the whole serie.
>
>
>>
>> Note that it is not yet a requirement to have 0 warnings for dtbs_check.
>> This will change in the future.
>>
>> Full log is available here: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1787034
>>
>>
>> dsi@40016c00: Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('panel-dsi@0' was
>> unexpected)
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f469-disco.dtb
>>
>> dsi@5a000000: Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('panel-dsi@0' was
>> unexpected)
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp157c-ev1.dtb
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp157c-ev1-scmi.dtb
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-30 13:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-29 9:13 [PATCH v4 0/4] STM32 warning cleanup Raphael Gallais-Pou
2023-05-29 9:13 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] ARM: dts: stm32: fix warnings on stm32f469-disco board Raphael Gallais-Pou
2023-05-29 9:13 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] dt-bindings: display: st,stm32-dsi: Remove unnecessary fields Raphael Gallais-Pou
2023-05-30 12:27 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-05-30 13:30 ` Alexandre TORGUE
2023-05-30 13:38 ` Raphael Gallais-Pou [this message]
2023-05-30 15:13 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-05-29 9:13 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] ARM: dts: stm32: fix dsi warnings on stm32mp15 boards Raphael Gallais-Pou
2023-05-29 9:51 ` Marek Vasut
2023-05-29 9:13 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] ARM: dts: stm32: fix ltdc warnings in " Raphael Gallais-Pou
2023-05-29 9:54 ` Marek Vasut
2023-05-30 8:19 ` [PATCH v4 0/4] STM32 warning cleanup Alexandre TORGUE
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=af31ae21-2711-2fac-e885-b3bbbcb12be8@foss.st.com \
--to=raphael.gallais-pou@foss.st.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=conor.dooley@microchip.com \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=kernel@dh-electronics.com \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
--cc=marex@denx.de \
--cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
--cc=philippe.cornu@foss.st.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=yannick.fertre@foss.st.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®