From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C95FECAAD3 for ; Wed, 7 Sep 2022 09:05:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230268AbiIGJF6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Sep 2022 05:05:58 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:38806 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229800AbiIGJFz (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Sep 2022 05:05:55 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1762AB7F5 for ; Wed, 7 Sep 2022 02:05:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19831D6E; Wed, 7 Sep 2022 02:06:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.57.15.197] (unknown [10.57.15.197]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B7C553F73D; Wed, 7 Sep 2022 02:06:20 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2022 10:05:48 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.2.1 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] iova: Remove some magazine pointer NULL checks Content-Language: en-GB To: John Garry , Ethan Zhao , joro@8bytes.org, will@kernel.org Cc: iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxarm@huawei.com References: <1662369083-238529-1-git-send-email-john.garry@huawei.com> <1662369083-238529-2-git-send-email-john.garry@huawei.com> <1d80f56c-bef7-6e5f-0bca-dad35f5e5a8e@linux.intel.com> <3fa23318-6fa7-eba0-30b8-1fb71e6c327e@huawei.com> <555fa5aa-a575-d783-dc97-79f63dcf2f57@arm.com> From: Robin Murphy In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2022-09-07 09:46, John Garry wrote: > On 06/09/2022 19:25, Robin Murphy wrote: >>> >>> Caveat: on the chance that the IOVA domain init fails due to the >>> rcache init failing, then, if there were another device in the group >>> which probes later, its probe would be ok as the start_pfn is set. >>> Not Good. >> >> Yeah, there's a lot not to like about iommu_dma_init_domain() - I've >> been banking on it all getting cleaned up when I get to refactoring >> that area of probing (remember the issue you reported years ago with >> PCI groups being built in the wrong order? All related...), but in >> fact since the cookie management got pulled into core code, we can >> probably tie the IOVA domain setup to that right now without much >> other involvement. That could be a cheap win, so I'll give it a go soon. > > ok, great. > > On a related topic, another thing to consider is that errors in IOVA > domain init are not handled gracefully in terms of how we deal with the > device probe and setting dma mapping ops, ref iommu_setup_dma_ops(). I > assume you know all this. > >> >>> - vdpa just fails to create the domain in vduse_domain_create() >>> >>>> That makes a fair amount of sense, but does mean that we're missing >>>> the equivalent in iova_rcache_insert() for it to actually work. Or >>>> we just remove it and tighten up the documentation to say that's not >>>> valid >>> >>> I'd be more inclined to remove it. I would rather remove fathpath >>> checks as much as possible and have robust error handling in the >>> domain init. >>> >>> Afterall I do have the "remove check" craze going. >> >> Sure, like I say I'm happy to be consistent either way. If I do end up >> reinstating such a check I think I'd prefer to have it explicit in >> {alloc,free}_iova_fast() anyway, rather than buried in internal >> implementation details. > > I'm not sure what you would like to see now, if anything. > > I could just remove the iovad->rcache check in iova_rcache_get().  It's > pretty useless (on its own) since we don't have the same check on the > "insert" path. Yup, just remove it. Sorting iommu-dma is yet another issue, but let's skip straight to fixing that properly by allocating the IOVA domain up-front with the cookie (is this the last remnant of my 7-year-old misunderstanding of dma_32bit_pfn? Let's hope so...) Thanks, Robin.