From: Bert Karwatzki <spasswolf@web.de>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@gmail.com>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org,
linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
adobriyan@gmail.com, jack@suse.cz, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
spasswolf@web.de
Subject: Re: context switch within RCU read-side critical section in next-20260518+ with PREEMPT_RT
Date: Thu, 21 May 2026 12:13:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <af66eacab6beef90c53880befde3d4baf6a8e383.camel@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87bje9w00o.ffs@tglx>
Am Donnerstag, dem 21.05.2026 um 12:05 +0200 schrieb Thomas Gleixner:
> On Thu, May 21 2026 at 10:53, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> > On Thu, May 21, 2026 at 12:52:44AM +0200, Bert Karwatzki wrote:
> > > With these reverts next-20260519 boots 30 times in a row without error, so
> > > it appears that commit dc651e25a6d2 ("fs: RCU-ify filesystems list") causing the
> > > error.
> > >
> >
> > I think the patch below will do the trick.
> >
> > If someone wonders how come the missing unlocks: the original patch had
> > them in place, but when I was rebasing on top of the RCU-ifing commit I
> > figured I'm going to do guard/scoped_guard in there as well. Later it
> > started failing as the compiler did not like goto retry out of a scoped
> > guard area and the unlocks did not come back.
> >
> > tl;dr there is definitely my bug here and it is most likely *the* bug
>
> I was staring at the wrong commit then :)
Sorry, as the bug was rather hard to trigger (with PREEMPT_RT at least) I
wanted to save myself from 100-150 reboot cycles during the bisection.
Bert Karwatzki
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-21 10:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-20 22:52 Bert Karwatzki
2026-05-21 8:37 ` Thomas Gleixner
2026-05-21 8:53 ` Mateusz Guzik
2026-05-21 9:08 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-05-21 9:17 ` Mateusz Guzik
2026-05-21 9:09 ` Mateusz Guzik
2026-05-21 9:20 ` Bert Karwatzki
2026-05-21 9:25 ` Mateusz Guzik
2026-05-21 9:57 ` Bert Karwatzki
2026-05-21 10:17 ` Thomas Gleixner
2026-05-21 10:21 ` Bert Karwatzki
2026-05-21 10:33 ` Mateusz Guzik
2026-05-21 11:50 ` Bert Karwatzki
2026-05-21 12:01 ` Mateusz Guzik
2026-05-28 17:59 ` Bert Karwatzki
2026-05-29 17:20 ` Mateusz Guzik
2026-05-21 12:55 ` [PATCH] amd/amdkfd: Initialize kfd_dev::profiler lock early Thomas Gleixner
2026-05-21 10:05 ` context switch within RCU read-side critical section in next-20260518+ with PREEMPT_RT Thomas Gleixner
2026-05-21 10:13 ` Bert Karwatzki [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=af66eacab6beef90c53880befde3d4baf6a8e383.camel@web.de \
--to=spasswolf@web.de \
--cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=mjguzik@gmail.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome