From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7DCAC379EF5; Tue, 28 Apr 2026 07:03:43 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.13 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1777359824; cv=none; b=O0ujIcpx7S08THjDWh7WJ4Iyh+mQCaAQYy7QGA8Mp3qexBRLKfAufhLqAEmFHV5VVyGIx2ffa+QAyRJq5OMLdeFQyU+Uxg7LMjMOTnIkkxvDfFqjrLCXwhxH8Ke7jNzfwFey56sTwBUdXARVKkMMmU5ktj4C87SCmkmo5t4mcxw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1777359824; c=relaxed/simple; bh=0e5M4yc3ess685BkE8ZzQE3e/UHaVHX93aWRiTbZf7M=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=B/sRqm4yUcMPQaDGJNXkUHEtwSYkZ72hyRy4IKxp81431tQf/mdwkj/iyNPOkPY167csxCRbmMWp7RSZmVEUsKfEDr5f8h2eQwQIEiV+sc1BAFOi68a+wMl1BQxS1TJWjJhL/y/6IWqKbpXzwr4orJLj3XaaxAAtRFnA38ObJmQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=mr3SK2iy; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.13 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="mr3SK2iy" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1777359824; x=1808895824; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=0e5M4yc3ess685BkE8ZzQE3e/UHaVHX93aWRiTbZf7M=; b=mr3SK2iyz48NlZa8HCaE2Qg0uR/Xh9DCnDBc1ZtEigS/N70eHGe2JoCr OQt/8aJdBIqPW7fU8CaYbILwLid4lUzeBIgZeMWpJtqj1CpQknUEzysVL v2x2r/9Wd09mQXFZJpPJx661eKC3QJQCxFHzaJ3mgh6VglAg7xgps92YD +9xxzv6GBEjmPn974nuJpN5YvFFHLaXjbY7RbKHpCwR9QJEMqwQcpw5u8 tlO2z66BaBbEYlk+kPyzO2uRFfIGfMkz61Aec6Jr9udtdNPNaERMus/pU O1lf7NqXDUzXWQutIwn2dv37jmuK87KoAf8DH59K+XHcV4LgqPFDwKFT8 Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: W1Yo4adjSKGyUFr69Gr2tQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: AZuyfLSJRLKYunHGfUHC7w== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11769"; a="89346584" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.23,203,1770624000"; d="scan'208";a="89346584" Received: from fmviesa007.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.147]) by orvoesa105.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 28 Apr 2026 00:03:43 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: +MnDoOurTHKlqO7mMNy0tA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 6mVg+Y40S3C+o1gAvDUW8Q== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.23,203,1770624000"; d="scan'208";a="230704571" Received: from kniemiec-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.245.244.213]) by fmviesa007-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 28 Apr 2026 00:03:41 -0700 Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2026 10:03:38 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Joshua Crofts Cc: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jonathan Cameron , David Lechner , Nuno =?iso-8859-1?Q?S=E1?= , Andy Shevchenko Subject: Re: [PATCH v0 00/14] iio: magnetometer: ak8975: Additional changes to the driver Message-ID: References: <20260427201412.3067235-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - c/o Alberga Business Park, 6 krs, Bertel Jungin Aukio 5, 02600 Espoo On Tue, Apr 28, 2026 at 08:37:22AM +0200, Joshua Crofts wrote: > On Mon, 27 Apr 2026 at 22:14, Andy Shevchenko > wrote: > > > > This series is an attempt to make the driver less a rabbit hole. > > It's a continuation of what Joshua Crofts started doing. Hence > > it is based on his work and first three "patches" here are supposed > > to be folded to his series accordingly. > > > > I have compile-tested them, but I haven't done full double check of > > the correctness from functional point of view. Joshua, please do that > > before incorporating into your series. Yes, my patches are assumed to > > become the part of Joshua's whatever next version of the series, that's > > why mine is marked as v0. > > > > Should not be taken directly by the maintainers, but any comments, review > > are highly appreciated. > > When you said a few changes, I didn't expect an 11-part series :). I'll go over > them and am them to my branch. I might check out the guard()() and chip_info > changes. On top of that also one may consider to switching to use reset-gpio instead of poking "reset" GPIO directly. But this sounds like too many for one go, let's make this 17 patch series go (6 yours + 11 mine). -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko