From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C484C43381 for ; Fri, 15 Feb 2019 15:16:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E7F121B18 for ; Fri, 15 Feb 2019 15:16:07 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b="s9jAQbIc" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1733172AbfBOPQF (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Feb 2019 10:16:05 -0500 Received: from lelv0142.ext.ti.com ([198.47.23.249]:38430 "EHLO lelv0142.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729628AbfBOPQE (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Feb 2019 10:16:04 -0500 Received: from fllv0034.itg.ti.com ([10.64.40.246]) by lelv0142.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x1FFEkwX031255; Fri, 15 Feb 2019 09:14:46 -0600 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1550243686; bh=kr/yj/ET7r+MTu59LeUQG+eCRdcH88hQiZBun5d/RDU=; h=Subject:To:CC:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=s9jAQbIc4BvxFBIZuhqT4iyuxWR88VBhtiWxosS87aDcitHiCux0HSHV4eIJHzvnV eMflI+N8NzPUolahJcfoZtX9gqExBtwonCAqEpavd2ERlxHU7Ii/NzNNt3JTFyYCZw 1vN49eXiysZhMN7CaENRobCq/qSUshqtDXi2dVdM= Received: from DFLE102.ent.ti.com (dfle102.ent.ti.com [10.64.6.23]) by fllv0034.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x1FFEkPS055739 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 15 Feb 2019 09:14:46 -0600 Received: from DFLE115.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.36) by DFLE102.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1591.10; Fri, 15 Feb 2019 09:14:46 -0600 Received: from dflp32.itg.ti.com (10.64.6.15) by DFLE115.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.36) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_0, cipher=TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA) id 15.1.1591.10 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 15 Feb 2019 09:14:45 -0600 Received: from [172.24.190.172] (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by dflp32.itg.ti.com (8.14.3/8.13.8) with ESMTP id x1FFEgd4021428; Fri, 15 Feb 2019 09:14:43 -0600 Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/37] ARM: davinci: modernize the irq support To: Bartosz Golaszewski , Dmitry Torokhov , Kevin Hilman , Thomas Gleixner , Jason Cooper , Marc Zyngier , David Lechner CC: , , Bartosz Golaszewski References: <20190214145231.8750-1-brgl@bgdev.pl> From: Sekhar Nori Message-ID: Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2019 20:44:42 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190214145231.8750-1-brgl@bgdev.pl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Marc, On 14/02/19 8:21 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > From: Bartosz Golaszewski > > This series ports the davinci platform to using SPARSE_IRQ, cleans up > the irqchip drivers and moves them over to drivers/irqchip. > > The series can be logically split into five parts. The first patch > preemptively fixes a problem in an input driver that would have caused > problems later. Patches (2-9) aim at introducing support for SPARSE_IRQ. > They contain a couple changes required for that functionality and do some > cleanup at the end. > > Third part (10-22) makes the aintc driver suitable for drivers/irqchip > and eventually moves it over there. > > Part 4 (23-36) does the same for the cp-intc driver. > > Last patch removes unnecessary code. > > The series has been tested on da850-lcdk (for cp-intc) and > dm365-evm (for aintc). Do you have any further comments? If no, I would like to apply for v5.1 with your ack. Thanks, Sekhar