From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-lf1-f49.google.com (mail-lf1-f49.google.com [209.85.167.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9248C37EFFB for ; Mon, 18 May 2026 17:05:40 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.167.49 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1779123942; cv=none; b=tsYlfrRuhQWR7dACZcmsAB45o27FpNu5kmTn8ZDpl2Yp5E4whvjpUKEIR7O8LGatXP1b6Lkr56CgGM2yXW2hwe00CBoq9LUdakJxInnsGDP7jeWm2BcL2UcP3R0RkV3PSwIa8JFvP9LVCzNfPRRDq5QcFQIg9gp5/a3aJnrFXBI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1779123942; c=relaxed/simple; bh=m8SQUb8kqmTppEfGLOTBXcoJkkJkB2TKAa6me5v22FI=; h=From:Date:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=c+i2H7IZ50CFMDoQxA0ewPu9fRu5baeILXMsSn1VubpigczcZvT0cRC3RLis5Y/6a613fvJykWSr0bHkA/aN9OedzNQ/G7A0RBfwSsNPh523ibuczBnEbLDZzuFoam5fz7mfRJP1huKTZYHsh3TMuaNKE71ewwbrvMjcc+hzNAs= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=Q7vIdy2G; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.167.49 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="Q7vIdy2G" Received: by mail-lf1-f49.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-5a8fbe18b1dso4202729e87.2 for ; Mon, 18 May 2026 10:05:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20251104; t=1779123939; x=1779728739; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:date:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=1aYdPPySXDTosAZCONGXYPhhFbBEQuaYinrf43tyh/0=; b=Q7vIdy2Gy22B2evykOhZgkC51l9/aPYg3xY9UylNE5y9kkbNdx1I7apYoezw+zEO9Q qmRuUP5nvN1wGs5+M7tQTfU2y4E7dkymKoqVoNPZKcEPAfeGG80XF1nwDJn7C8ffP1dv 2y+U0e9hptWEd1KuDfEkMlqMux6b+j11ENlmFCo6RqOKuKzoCNY9rinWi2dZB9DUVBpZ qmKdKxl6AltEcHQ2rUKtDEuhxhvRpA4mXP4L7pWYtshPShtH80GTNF65V/Zb7o9LIHYU Fg/3V34LVnwpNI4YG4hyLmVofWb6Z4rGIqMgv+c+bYNqlIKHYN7qAII51sJeuftHkACp lgfA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20251104; t=1779123939; x=1779728739; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:date:from:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=1aYdPPySXDTosAZCONGXYPhhFbBEQuaYinrf43tyh/0=; b=CWTwoypMvl95d9/Hmc6cUIUBhfbpcmjzyhSU0fqAeqIHCpggg1P2cKGzggx+vApgf3 vE1rjKDiYIZFx2NfpKLMHJ6/4deim08okJJjVozF9gRkaNGfXHWKW/iewkHSRM/M0eQZ t5yK+NVEugHyLSryPSC+7mW61/pzWvTE0RBcLaLos93LkLoayxC361STI7FH9ekYlTaC UGyyB12MQPHA0OOlXxSPTjmJgrNZxUZAxeK9tMvjyIf7Mf5kY6u9ahXgbgiG5WQrAVtx 8VS5SHxplEes9jwgN4TXg6VqpgT8V4fNnOm+nyv5aolzYxz5bsdItXulWPP4DcZhIIn5 hrwA== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AFNElJ/q/lXkCRcVkmxSJpBaSfurJaS0tHbSCxfD6DFiNhlfPx35FTtFH2zSlutecFVS/O2PJJ18CCbPxnYL4bE=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzQ7lvv58+i2wGEGeDpVPiLAcvQEAOhn8Ceqhhwah+A9nO+3o3m cDb9ziyozF9wsCBu9GSyBM+THT0ka326jkJJ2ej3A+gb1Okgm2P5YttW X-Gm-Gg: Acq92OEsUrGHfhkAMGerx/ctp5JW7hiiMBd+4UUDwuJ0IVpFpcvYAmPqZIv51FcM3Kn D/MVYlQLAK0IHeiiSXMuRfoLYbwmRkHxdGoEi8Gzw7agz8K9l6lF4+Vay/kOYIV5l35KEeCbdlm PuL5g1ekbzTVqaEMMXoNZl3Zwc7jC78q8eIakQnFEmq4A3wdHZg1nGpl8yygsNS0IiZtkeBxdPd ADrfTzfVRwisT7ZeGsmV+cxMcn2j/sEiNeM4rv6PpUDFt2WtnER0IOAh9M8N3BFdMpS7v8WcVLZ PxzqJo24x9ZJs7nU7E1jVeqx1ZbdJipolIQOcqiULBZAEEoncFcsUv500jbzHjPahOSszxCD+t1 vzF5J8IaFQsL9MQnVXldqjWlBmmpP1XH82BLYfesCxFrB7sb+/3Z3T3mFG6dKuAt9wn4uLcCfGY I= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:3406:b0:5a8:e61c:371c with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-5aa0e7638afmr5741206e87.26.1779123938228; Mon, 18 May 2026 10:05:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from milan ([2001:9b1:d5a0:a500::24b]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 2adb3069b0e04-5a9164c5712sm3391074e87.59.2026.05.18.10.05.37 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 18 May 2026 10:05:37 -0700 (PDT) From: Uladzislau Rezki X-Google-Original-From: Uladzislau Rezki Date: Mon, 18 May 2026 19:05:36 +0200 To: Boqun Feng Cc: Thorsten Leemhuis , paulmck@kernel.org, Uladzislau Rezki , Boqun Feng , Joel Fernandes , RCU , LKML , Vasily Gorbik , Frederic Weisbecker , Samir , Shrikanth Hegde , Tejun Heo , Linux kernel regressions list , Jiri Slaby Subject: Re: [PATCH -next v1 05/12] srcu: Don't queue workqueue handlers to never-online CPUs Message-ID: References: <20260511175448.153326-1-urezki@gmail.com> <20260511175448.153326-6-urezki@gmail.com> <3dd5cce0-51f9-4cf1-81b8-246e6c6a633a@paulmck-laptop> <53d546e4-8db0-4e14-a79d-270212081be7@leemhuis.info> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Mon, May 18, 2026 at 09:13:46AM -0700, Boqun Feng wrote: > On Sun, May 17, 2026 at 09:11:10PM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > > On 5/17/26 20:03, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > On Sun, May 17, 2026 at 02:47:55PM +0200, Uladzislau Rezki wrote: > > >> On Wed, May 13, 2026 at 12:38:01PM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > > >>> On 5/11/26 19:54, Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) wrote: > > >>>> From: "Paul E. McKenney" > > >>>> > > >>>> While an srcu_struct structure is in the midst of switching from CPU-0 > > >>>> to all-CPUs state, it can attempt to invoke callbacks for CPUs that > > >>>> have never been online. Worse yet, it can attempt in invoke callbacks > > >>>> for CPUs that never will be online, even including imaginary CPUs not in > > >>>> cpu_possible_mask. This can cause hangs on s390, > > >>> > > >>> Uladzislau, Paul, according to the fixes tag below this change fixes a > > >>> change that went into 7.0-rc6 -- and apparently causes a "hang" on some > > >>> architectures. So shouldn't this be heading to mainline instead of > > >>> -next? Ideally with a stable tag to ensure backporting to 7.0.y, but > > >>> that is a separate decision? > > >>> > > FWIW, I'm happy to create an urgent PR to Linus with this fix. Since it > fixes a commit in the previous urgent fix PR from me. Ulad, let me know > if you want me to do it. > I do not mind :) So i can drop this patch! -- Uladzislau Rezki