From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B8B42571DD; Mon, 18 May 2026 19:51:54 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1779133915; cv=none; b=fVY6sRubuU/4PnzwhBu8608loGEKNZgBZGGTS/lMMtGlT61Ew4ay266L0pExrbz0hIMCoI8Gca4mTWJSrmqtOfjt5QZ9VFp/2sh1XscaY1GJaJKFGhFoMDh2IcxhTV2sUmrU4m+6F4CFPSJASwfZDmAG37w2yteL21i5gMg6d+g= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1779133915; c=relaxed/simple; bh=0EDZC3hd1XIo9RQYnoioqSdk6FylXyXD32g6lc8WK80=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=C5CXlHRsGs3ZOgNANOheOfwDifoYjpVu6UCsmKTL1f6mp6Toxan5VJvDTRnjdBCT3iyLskpD0CoNz9Ayp3mRvPxGJx3mH5iwrjuntZ8yXmxcjLb5iDaKfOj7/M5YBmJvFeof+LzB9RAErvbpbkiUwyxBcnD8ErSlgm4QfV1kh7E= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=A3KTXS+Q; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="A3KTXS+Q" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 71871C2BCB7; Mon, 18 May 2026 19:51:54 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1779133914; bh=0EDZC3hd1XIo9RQYnoioqSdk6FylXyXD32g6lc8WK80=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=A3KTXS+Q/AEBoZ4uNfNUsQ0k+ej9XaXq69rCQFPw1ygtZW43gGcEuMye/wWE45zdM YMDY+mI9YFi+aDyqPtX65ur9P0c1QLANOG7IYdZsxcU5O4TksyH0HhEMICOGFtEsDu NbqOY4ZUq2HB4h+bfnVdA26kN4pBS4xYv5DFT9gazLd16W7FbrqAVkcww8+KXOp2eb jkLATaJa7wZKYa7Y3RhuUVAq34sssOBxg9XNnYenpE4Kl2gYVnA293XdgSXNGs1/Y7 aOE88cBDoObjjaZ5K6sWE4I1ly4Ftfz3HR+tVZRTJvCijUZ6tVmR9iJuQl7V3aRIho Az/hnaRVwWgCA== Date: Mon, 18 May 2026 09:51:53 -1000 From: Tejun Heo To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: David Vernet , Andrea Righi , Changwoo Min , Alexei Starovoitov , Andrii Nakryiko , Daniel Borkmann , Martin KaFai Lau , Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Dave Hansen , Andrew Morton , David Hildenbrand , Mike Rapoport , Emil Tsalapatis , sched-ext@lists.linux.dev, bpf@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] sched_ext: Sub-allocator over kernel-claimed BPF arena pages Message-ID: References: <20260517211232.1670594-1-tj@kernel.org> <20260517211232.1670594-8-tj@kernel.org> <20260518072042.GP3102624@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260518072042.GP3102624@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> Hello, On Mon, May 18, 2026 at 09:20:42AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: ... > Should this really be part of scx rather than be part of the bpf-arena > thing proper? It's just a layer on top of arena. If bpf folks are okay with it, I don't see why it can't be a common utility thing on the bpf side. Thanks. -- tejun