From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx.nabladev.com (mx.nabladev.com [178.251.229.89]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8ED96349CE7; Mon, 1 Jun 2026 08:47:19 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=178.251.229.89 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1780303641; cv=none; b=LNpJUPNTN8rWjMcTYvICm9QGHIza+Mfxu/hjUvRA86QMaTII/OcUP0cynjrGprlBVedhm7Elh6JMTQbnmCkPSjVTJGbrjoRd8oKSHshyZ9RxD/2tS7k/QAP9nRiCPn4l6yvHEkbBZd0V8nVtTenVJGewELBJVJqqwat7oqqm/ZA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1780303641; c=relaxed/simple; bh=FvWO1DQR9PSK/kSEH1HSoxZBaYkieoINGM+a+PKJUVE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=hGdYvHj6GCJUUywzGHrm/YydsY0gNnVD/xtrrA8cAd4Bhhzvf2Ush3rVrvz8CyzOFrWTeHcj7DilmLeOr9TMEQ31rgqCDRsIs6lPp6/zLK92UGv26yhGu4WRjFSLx2QO32qDQdvC3quYiEH5m64z0MgaghM5WMc5wWI98AMwI3E= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=nabladev.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=nabladev.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=nabladev.com header.i=@nabladev.com header.b=gCK/lI1P; arc=none smtp.client-ip=178.251.229.89 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=nabladev.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=nabladev.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=nabladev.com header.i=@nabladev.com header.b="gCK/lI1P" Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Mailerdaemon) with ESMTPSA id 9C3BF116C40; Mon, 1 Jun 2026 10:47:08 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nabladev.com; s=dkim; t=1780303631; h=from:subject:date:message-id:to:cc:mime-version:content-type: in-reply-to:references; bh=YIeqwSroJEmQZI2uQ5WI4926AydeuIuVX4oqsN3tzz8=; b=gCK/lI1Pi6ZdyXqxfKSelEi2CA0EOtX6+IaNEBX0im434GQE76XUuFUrrkVJmGpdS0i6Ph 3r6LlwAZsynaRe2jNAA5qi8K5be0Nfu7tdSwWtWyN5fSqxL8BI/ovtgh+6SkkYi+InRi+1 Kn39h0eXej87vNgOGH5CssgKklX6RfQ4VhOjLuF6Y5caG3SvnRFwm2qlzZwUzey5CpiIPn 33XXVVAsEWMU6Gw+g1QeKcLjfeYUOzG3KR0XWXSExfVwjqjoJoapY2t/4HHNB4mDxodViN n0KsAkA2qpJnuuei/YKYsvR1FT50inxoW2ja8NprweQuqhSedY3cphfC2fMAhQ== Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2026 10:47:06 +0200 From: Pavel Machek To: Greg Kroah-Hartman , claudiu.beznea@kernel.org, Chris.Paterson2@renesas.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@nabladev.com, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com, rwarsow@gmx.de, conor@kernel.org, hargar@microsoft.com, broonie@kernel.org, achill@achill.org, sr@sladewatkins.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/589] 5.10.258-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20260530160224.570625122@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="wPkJT+ToGdUfRPPt" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260530160224.570625122@linuxfoundation.org> X-Last-TLS-Session-Version: TLSv1.3 --wPkJT+ToGdUfRPPt Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Hi! > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.258 release. > There are 589 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. We see boot failures on 5.10-cip: https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/pipelines/2564188475 https://lava.ciplatform.org/scheduler/job/1451830 This may be related to [PATCH v3] phy: renesas: rcar-gen3-usb2: Avoid long delay in atomic context but I don't see related patches in the shortlog below. I put Renesas people in the cc list, they should know more. Best regards, Pavel --wPkJT+ToGdUfRPPt Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EABECAB0WIQRPfPO7r0eAhk010v0w5/Bqldv68gUCah1HCgAKCRAw5/Bqldv6 8u4lAJ403IuxbDkgW7SL4NdEnFK61WHBNQCfSMZnfRg2hVXgRqOWkqgBGTmb+TY= =XZNf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --wPkJT+ToGdUfRPPt--