From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>
Cc: Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@suse.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>, Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] workqueue: Add warnings and check WQ flags usage
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2026 04:47:19 -1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ah2bd_V2QHQftm2o@slm.duckdns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5b2dea50-2850-4876-b6e8-ba94b9a85034@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
On Mon, Jun 01, 2026 at 07:12:28AM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> I've spent more than one year for updating all in-tree users who are
> flushing kernel global workqueues. Please see a message from Linus at
> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CAHk-=whWreGjEQ6yasspzBrNnS7EQiL+SknToWt=SzUh4XomyQ@mail.gmail.com .
>
> Please never try to emit WARNING: or BUG: message just for letting developers
> update their code. If you can't use panic() instead of WARN*() or BUG*(), you
> should not use WARN*() or BUG*(). The patch author who changes the behavior of
> in-tree code is responsible for updating all in-tree code.
I don't think a statement this blanket makes sense. I scanned the existing
linux-next tree and there were a handful that were missed (I didn't find out
whether they are new ones in linux-next or ones that were misseds from
mainline tho). Let's just apply the nvme-tcp patch and move on.
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-01 14:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-29 13:06 Marco Crivellari
2026-05-29 13:06 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] workqueue: Add warnings and fallback if system_{unbound}_wq is used Marco Crivellari
2026-05-29 13:06 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] workqueue: Add warnings and ensure one among WQ_PERCPU or WQ_UNBOUND is present Marco Crivellari
2026-05-29 18:07 ` [PATCH v4 0/2] workqueue: Add warnings and check WQ flags usage Tejun Heo
2026-05-30 10:54 ` Tetsuo Handa
2026-05-31 16:48 ` Tejun Heo
2026-05-31 22:12 ` Tetsuo Handa
2026-06-01 14:47 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2026-06-01 17:51 ` Tetsuo Handa
2026-06-10 12:48 ` Tetsuo Handa
2026-06-10 15:22 ` Mark Brown
2026-06-10 17:28 ` Nathan Chancellor
2026-06-11 10:28 ` Mark Brown
2026-06-12 13:12 ` Tetsuo Handa
2026-06-01 15:41 ` Marco Crivellari
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ah2bd_V2QHQftm2o@slm.duckdns.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marco.crivellari@suse.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome