From: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
To: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, David Vernet <void@manifault.com>,
Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@arm.com>,
Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com>, Koba Ko <kobak@nvidia.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@nvidia.com>,
Richard Cheng <icheng@nvidia.com>,
Cheng-Yang Chou <yphbchou0911@gmail.com>,
sched-ext@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET v3 sched_ext/for-7.2] sched_ext: Auto-manage ext/fair dl_server bandwidth
Date: Wed, 27 May 2026 14:36:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ahblQnYT6Y9CTJMJ@jlelli-thinkpadt14gen4.remote.csb> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260526164420.638711-1-arighi@nvidia.com>
Hi Andrea,
On 26/05/26 18:42, Andrea Righi wrote:
> Currently, a fixed bandwidth is reserved at boot for both the fair and ext
> deadline servers, and this reservation remains unchanged unless explicitly
> modified via debugfs. As a result, both servers permanently contribute to global
> bandwidth accounting, regardless of whether a BPF scheduler is active.
>
> While unused bandwidth can still be reclaimed at runtime by other classes, this
> static reservation prevents RT from fully utilizing available headroom in
> situations where one of the sched_ext or fair class is guaranteed to be inactive
> (for example, when no BPF scheduler is loaded, or when sched_ext runs in full
> mode and replaces fair).
>
> As discussed at the VIII OSPM summit in Cambridge [1], a better solution would
> be to dynamically register and unregister deadline server bandwidth based on the
> active sched_ext state. This allows the kernel to automatically enable bandwidth
> accounting only for the scheduling class that is currently active, while
> disabling it for inactive ones.
>
> This patch series implements this automatic register/unregister logic. Moreover,
> the sched_ext total_bw kselftest is also modified to validate the correct
> behavior across the different scheduling configurations and ensure that
> bandwidth accounting follows the expected state transitions.
>
> [1] https://retis.santannapisa.it/ospm-summit/
>
> Git tree: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arighi/linux.git dl-server-bw-v3
>
> Changes in v3:
> - Don't bypass __dl_overflow() for detached servers in dl_server_apply_params()
> to reject oversized configs up front (reported by Sashiko)
> - A potential divide-by-zero in dl_server_apply_params() reported by Sashiko
> has been fixed in a separate patch (not introduced by this patch set):
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260526100502.575774-1-arighi@nvidia.com/
> - Link to v2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260526082954.550958-1-arighi@nvidia.com/
This looks now good to me.
Acked-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Thanks!
Juri
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-27 12:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-26 16:42 Andrea Righi
2026-05-26 16:42 ` [PATCH 1/2] sched_ext: Auto-register/unregister dl_server reservations Andrea Righi
2026-05-28 11:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-28 16:13 ` Andrea Righi
2026-05-29 10:45 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Andrea Righi
2026-05-26 16:42 ` [PATCH 2/2] selftests/sched_ext: Validate dl_server attach/detach in total_bw test Andrea Righi
2026-05-29 10:45 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Andrea Righi
2026-05-27 12:36 ` Juri Lelli [this message]
2026-05-28 11:33 ` [PATCHSET v3 sched_ext/for-7.2] sched_ext: Auto-manage ext/fair dl_server bandwidth Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-28 16:13 ` Andrea Righi
2026-05-28 15:53 ` Tejun Heo
2026-05-29 9:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ahblQnYT6Y9CTJMJ@jlelli-thinkpadt14gen4.remote.csb \
--to=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=arighi@nvidia.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=changwoo@igalia.com \
--cc=christian.loehle@arm.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=icheng@nvidia.com \
--cc=joelagnelf@nvidia.com \
--cc=kobak@nvidia.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pauld@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sched-ext@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=void@manifault.com \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=yphbchou0911@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®