From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A7B03361668 for ; Wed, 27 May 2026 19:04:38 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1779908679; cv=none; b=aqNNjhiRY7mwILvvGu/ILl9VmMjGSmxDLPRyGRtWB5Gz6jIeZucwXACyDy15s+4djNkTOrAjadiwp4lPS3zmNH44fHqO3lATDuF+PjXd1y0u0vqCRK9hFWIsuRXSoPBQ2G2HyUzLWFWVVGrG1QfH7lHFeGehSBH1HcscPpe3I3Y= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1779908679; c=relaxed/simple; bh=HdrsBa7sdbCzUC5njuWQLNij/n1S91EjLXCaGG0ooqU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=PENBxpjv/X3mgN6wGLtAd/ugXLywX03WCLSL1SuVEAXffjB0meGpEK1X1WRs2CYMdsx3zct2O5162V4WqGFDj6knIuaqMKDe/4ivjPNVEfkSpfaocp40tJm0UB9D6f5oyZeEzf+TFlM47jc5DDQ0KS7TLHlkCgCS5sftfaIMGNU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=GCmMMV9J; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="GCmMMV9J" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3086E1F000E9; Wed, 27 May 2026 19:04:38 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1779908678; bh=vL/mmN23hwmlkmF/bmgWbIfVxvZz4Eqpg+d8F0k4LbE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=GCmMMV9JfE+Ila45U9T3Wt8ggbJzUAw9oAkzgy2om+2vSzWq4qCWCoiAHUcRJlXRW mLfM04j3HX+0NAc9jvJCkG57yl7L9/VvYWwnvjEtRtiFtVNNGb1n/Ud39L3xhPTVLp JVPLJY/aKfMfAi4MMJZyzRT0Hv+BkO27z1DEp4EVqPkwQu4IqR44aXjjtHMW2BFx01 3lKgeEyRqM3KPF4UuUlfO93cSn/RZAHH2nsDbEfdQEowrTLqjRmhJgSOiazUGBkczQ Rk+K7hv1Ho6QbU/9UatheMeG55BxMziR1oC2kqueNSfWLxiUuf53iAS+ImtNHTWLzv WSqmYmgkfNmwg== Date: Wed, 27 May 2026 09:04:37 -1000 From: Tejun Heo To: Fernand Sieber Cc: Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Juri Lelli , Vincent Guittot , David Vernet , Andrea Righi , Changwoo Min , Dietmar Eggemann , Ben Segall , Mel Gorman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, nh-open-source@amazon.com, Fahad Mubeen , Hendrik Borghorst , David Woodhouse Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] sched/fair: expose cpu.max.runtime to set bandwidth runtime directly Message-ID: References: <20260525193622.70282-1-sieberf@amazon.com> <20260525193622.70282-2-sieberf@amazon.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260525193622.70282-2-sieberf@amazon.com> On Mon, May 25, 2026 at 09:36:21PM +0200, Fernand Sieber wrote: > Add a cpu.max.runtime cgroup v2 interface that allows userspace to set > the CFS bandwidth controller's runtime directly. This enables CPU credit > injection: an orchestrator writes a runtime budget which the cgroup > consumes naturally through the existing bandwidth enforcement mechanism. Can you detail the use case? What problem is it solving how? Thanks. -- tejun