From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7EFDA357A40 for ; Wed, 3 Jun 2026 13:58:46 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.17 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1780495134; cv=none; b=SeSMqWF5WWrGxejIv7E+vwVL4lrA3QEpw7ofNLf7tMvQxUNL2I9Rp+A0cXP2QNbAyJBbEpUqzzDXfq/yBMr3nqrHaeAF4hzo3U0akhKZ8hEmqUjuRCxaFftOLY7Et+q6Xn+Cua+uSzqtrTHzWN+2g3sHFruuXR3CDWh97i21goQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1780495134; c=relaxed/simple; bh=6t/lQQlXRZX/LzWyrEL6uN1JO4XH48EUavW5jyfAo38=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Kb7NbBIQNe/VSi+VCZRZjijgvOEkhU4FaiK0SlnIp6Asl71fsC3QrrwmB/m7rg1v7nR271rQPKxA0wJkstEM/v2KEEOXRvTF7MxISTH44F+4fTByfhPiZVcfC41V1oYUX0DH5XRmF+vuuU+1a4FsDo6RB+I9OA4Q/lJ/EflZ1Ow= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=bAsfAUgy; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.17 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="bAsfAUgy" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1780495127; x=1812031127; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=6t/lQQlXRZX/LzWyrEL6uN1JO4XH48EUavW5jyfAo38=; b=bAsfAUgytn7M37cDMlSiAxUOx0T/LwYcKWZ0BnMisGn0oYCWe3XKV+Jv hkJJHs0SBkqzQUcJ4exJPAVxQcXMdxbEf+5do1VP8Zgp2z+PRi3hQkn/S m4q58luuzKzQUE37TSZZLLouDmOXMOf/xI2nOeVAdwFXzp5hF/CvroQ4G T8PJTFIKY/xOlCMEI3Pa6/Nwb4CJUxrtFJROgd4O284u+02Y50IoU1qwD nsJo+cdtuu+BTE/7+4KlJKaCqzAQ6RuJtbrNwiSrPgCqY/fRKZ6VBhz8D oUstVBvF7Du3T2sxMHYx4yzmaEqpjJKMA/oiMlVqac5vvQZNa4E+hus48 g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: i/M/tS5mTKCPQ8E2xvh4Kg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: cnA3K8QaSYOiE0BgilXkZw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11805"; a="81301371" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.24,185,1774335600"; d="scan'208";a="81301371" Received: from fmviesa007.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.147]) by orvoesa109.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 03 Jun 2026 06:58:46 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 2Io5qKpjRsO1RmHOfC4gwQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: S8BprW83QEGU8O7kmb6jsQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.24,185,1774335600"; d="scan'208";a="241266662" Received: from slindbla-desk.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.245.244.250]) by fmviesa007-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 03 Jun 2026 06:58:43 -0700 Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2026 16:58:40 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Rodrigo Alencar <455.rodrigo.alencar@gmail.com> Cc: Petr Mladek , Dmitry Antipov , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Steven Rostedt , Rasmus Villemoes , Sergey Senozhatsky , rodrigo.alencar@analog.com, dlechner@baylibre.com, jic23@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] kstrtox: make _parse_integer() flexible Message-ID: References: <20260602203706.103449-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - c/o Alberga Business Park, 6 krs, Bertel Jungin Aukio 5, 02600 Espoo On Wed, Jun 03, 2026 at 01:10:11PM +0100, Rodrigo Alencar wrote: > On 26/06/03 12:51PM, Rodrigo Alencar wrote: > > On 26/06/03 01:23PM, Petr Mladek wrote: ... > Actually the example pattern with static inline is not this one, it is > under linux/reset.h with __devm_reset_control_get(). > > If every one agrees I can add that to the v16 of the patch series > of the PLL driver. ...which shows disadvantage of the naming (it grows quite rapidly towards the nonsense, like devm_reset_control_array_get_exclusive_released(). Again, that's public API and I see at least some value in that. In more closed one as we discuss in this thread that adds no value. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko