From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.8]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E79DF387372; Thu, 4 Jun 2026 08:53:51 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.8 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1780563233; cv=none; b=Vx1dziRX3UT6H9GyID8Na0Lynit1DnR/BGAMG5yynS0pSVVmK9h3pBFjwreoyB+enJwBVoJ8FfzlqfNU5rS5dJ/Dm6NadW22Bpo2FRgwSMyO33aNhYR9l819sWUdEr9T27GMy9THO0ZdXkZ4mmPfuQy/owvDAbnHvjeqRBJ4QpM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1780563233; c=relaxed/simple; bh=27Hx/I+FZJvMLbtvyHv3evL+ddwk+n7RoBOYihns5cU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=E0zZZumZ5eyv4/NQX+ONEVJrxuIuKBlOOYBYm6dQeN1gy2eCLbUVatqCq5zYK9KI0AMAcsDLEAeLxJbNy4boEFK8zhQcZ6Ue0mS7s+2rGH1ioo21fc4uPDfvZFAjQLJZz7L00NjxmsTc/RXw+H/YeE5ejq0vqT8GqLEAX8zZnvk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=DNnH8Agj; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.8 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="DNnH8Agj" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1780563232; x=1812099232; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=27Hx/I+FZJvMLbtvyHv3evL+ddwk+n7RoBOYihns5cU=; b=DNnH8AgjdJon1by1yheCz2RaKb1XE0x0+xCA5unf8LOKNdPV79gHO/UH hxTvaNrN8anQoBqaEuzvhvQkJ8EsN1wEUkIP1LhL67qFOatB+5A4VY9li W8DX7GlPSAkhMTlCq9UN7Uvd9o09NhyDFMAQW8GiXuiDpHyuveVOjgk3t wuj5A9uEnLr6nnYCZ7bP7dvqLOqEoNWyO6A9dAu1VXtzp27qJVg8Tqi2T Jm7EunkQtctTiWeMds9VAZNxeg1qytf0QM+zWBg0Hc10BXSiXCcCNWTjG 7Fepqa9DwrbYm6LiczqRdEBFnBsjm+dHbW+FTAVBwkjmwe2fZK/gDcH4a Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 8vQQTwj2QhuzK+ok18sTXg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: oHOI8vPXRb6o+WmyB87Lbw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11806"; a="98960079" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.24,186,1774335600"; d="scan'208";a="98960079" Received: from orviesa004.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.144]) by fmvoesa102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 04 Jun 2026 01:53:50 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: vZ/cBMvWToGGhuWyhwiDsQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: fOOrQdsKTD2/XFKiVEzfWg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.24,186,1774335600"; d="scan'208";a="248837263" Received: from ettammin-mobl3.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.245.245.47]) by orviesa004-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 04 Jun 2026 01:53:47 -0700 Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2026 11:53:44 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Miao Li Cc: jic23@kernel.org, dlechner@baylibre.com, nuno.sa@analog.com, andy@kernel.org, dixitparmar19@gmail.com, waqar.hameed@axis.com, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, limiao@kylinos.cn Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] iio: accel: stk8312: Update includes to match IWYU Message-ID: References: <20260604070053.299221-1-limiao870622@163.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260604070053.299221-1-limiao870622@163.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - c/o Alberga Business Park, 6 krs, Bertel Jungin Aukio 5, 02600 Espoo On Thu, Jun 04, 2026 at 03:00:53PM +0800, Miao Li wrote: > Update the list of included headers in stk8312.c using > Include-What-You-Use (IWYU) tool, mainly to remove kernel.h > and add missing headers such as array_size.h, bits.h, > dev_printk.h, etc. > Meanwhile, sort these headers in alphabetical order. Usually we do sort in a separate change, but here it's just about a single unordered item, so I believe it's completely fine to combine (in _this_ case). Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko