From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>
To: Herman van Hazendonk <github.com@herrie.org>
Cc: jic23@kernel.org, linusw@kernel.org, denis.ciocca@st.com,
robh@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org,
dlechner@baylibre.com, nuno.sa@analog.com, andy@kernel.org,
sanjayembeddedse@gmail.com, maudspierings@gocontroll.com,
linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] iio: common: st_sensors: honour channel endianness in read_axis_data
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2026 20:47:36 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aiMLuIlRPHXuj3cH@ashevche-desk.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0dac8e8e2872dc180b138923b5cd4fd18eee047b.1780652883.git.github.com@herrie.org>
On Fri, Jun 05, 2026 at 12:08:41PM +0200, Herman van Hazendonk wrote:
> st_sensors_read_axis_data() unconditionally decoded multi-byte
> results with get_unaligned_le16() / get_unaligned_le24() regardless
> of the channel's declared scan_type.endianness.
>
> For every ST sensor that has used this helper since it was introduced
> this happened to be fine because the ST IMU/accel/gyro/pressure
> families publish their data registers as little-endian and the
> channel specs in those drivers declare IIO_LE accordingly.
>
> The LSM303DLH magnetometer however publishes its X/Y/Z output as a
> pair of big-endian bytes (the H register sits at the lower address,
> 0x03/0x05/0x07, and the L register immediately after), and its
> channel specs in st_magn_core.c correctly declare IIO_BE -- but
> read_axis_data() ignored that and decoded as little-endian, swapping
> the high and low bytes of every magnetometer sample.
>
> The bug is most visible on a stationary chip: in earth's field the
> true X reading is small and the high byte sits at 0x00, so swapping
> the bytes pins sysfs X at exactly the low byte's pattern (e.g. 0x00F0
> = 240). Y and Z still appear "to vary" because their magnitudes are
> larger and the noise in the low byte produces big swings in the
> swapped high byte:
>
> before (chip flat, sysfs in_magn_*_raw):
> X=240 (stuck), Y= 12032..23296, Z=-16128..-9728
>
> after (direct i2c-dev big-endian decode, same chip same orientation):
> X≈-4096, Y≈210, Z≈80 (sensible values reflecting earth's
> ambient field at low gauss range)
>
> Fix read_axis_data() to dispatch on ch->scan_type.endianness and
> call get_unaligned_be16() / get_unaligned_be24() when the channel
> declares IIO_BE. Existing IIO_LE consumers (st_accel, st_gyro,
> st_pressure, st_lsm6dsx and others) are unaffected because their
> channel specs already declare IIO_LE and the LE path is unchanged.
...
> - if (byte_for_channel == 1)
> + if (byte_for_channel == 1) {
> *data = (s8)*outdata;
Maybe for the consistency's sake use sign_extend32() everywhere?
> + } else if (byte_for_channel == 2) {
> + if (ch->scan_type.endianness == IIO_BE)
> + *data = (s16)get_unaligned_be16(outdata);
> + else
> + *data = (s16)get_unaligned_le16(outdata);
> + } else if (byte_for_channel == 3) {
> + if (ch->scan_type.endianness == IIO_BE)
> + *data = (s32)sign_extend32(get_unaligned_be24(outdata),
> + 23);
> + else
> + *data = (s32)sign_extend32(get_unaligned_le24(outdata),
> + 23);
Why do you need casting here? sign_extend32() should return signed type.
With this being addressed, you can make them one-liners.
> + }
u32 tmp;
...
if (byte_for_channel == 1) {
// this way is done to show the below variant
tmp = *outdata;
*data = sign_extend32(tmp, 7);
} else if (byte_for_channel == 2) {
if (ch->scan_type.endianness == IIO_BE)
tmp = get_unaligned_be16(outdata);
else
tmp = get_unaligned_le16(outdata);
*data = sign_extend32(tmp, 15);
} else if (byte_for_channel == 3) {
if (ch->scan_type.endianness == IIO_BE)
tmp = get_unaligned_be24(outdata);
else
tmp = get_unaligned_le24(outdata);
*data = sign_extend32(tmp, 23);
}
Or even
if (byte_for_channel == 1) {
tmp = *outdata;
} else if (byte_for_channel == 2) {
if (ch->scan_type.endianness == IIO_BE)
tmp = get_unaligned_be16(outdata);
else
tmp = get_unaligned_le16(outdata);
} else if (byte_for_channel == 3) {
if (ch->scan_type.endianness == IIO_BE)
tmp = get_unaligned_be24(outdata);
else
tmp = get_unaligned_le24(outdata);
} else {
...error...
}
*data = sign_extend32(tmp, BYTES_TO_BITS(byte_for_channel) - 1);
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-05 17:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-05 10:08 [PATCH 0/3] iio: lsm303dlh-magn: endianness + boot-time fullscale selection Herman van Hazendonk
2026-06-05 10:08 ` [PATCH 1/3] iio: common: st_sensors: honour channel endianness in read_axis_data Herman van Hazendonk
2026-06-05 17:47 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2026-06-15 12:41 ` me
2026-06-14 18:39 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-06-15 11:12 ` me
2026-06-05 10:08 ` [PATCH 2/3] dt-bindings: iio: st,st-sensors: add st,fullscale-mg Herman van Hazendonk
2026-06-05 16:07 ` Conor Dooley
2026-06-07 22:54 ` Linus Walleij
2026-06-14 18:44 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-06-15 11:16 ` me
2026-06-21 12:41 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-06-05 10:08 ` [PATCH 3/3] iio: magnetometer: st_magn: honour st,fullscale-mg DT property Herman van Hazendonk
2026-06-05 17:52 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-06-15 12:40 ` me
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aiMLuIlRPHXuj3cH@ashevche-desk.local \
--to=andriy.shevchenko@intel.com \
--cc=andy@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=denis.ciocca@st.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dlechner@baylibre.com \
--cc=github.com@herrie.org \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linusw@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maudspierings@gocontroll.com \
--cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sanjayembeddedse@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome