Re: [PATCH] kernel: Change word in comment to a correct form to convey the meaning

[Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@gmail.com>]

On 16:55 Sun 07 Jun 2026, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>On Mon, Jun 08, 2026 at 04:07:19AM +0530, Bhaskar Chowdhury wrote:
>> s/irreproducibly/irreproducible/
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@gmail.com>
>> ---
>>  kernel/context_tracking.c | 2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/context_tracking.c b/kernel/context_tracking.c
>> index a743e7ffa6c0..fda4ec211963 100644
>> --- a/kernel/context_tracking.c
>> +++ b/kernel/context_tracking.c
>> @@ -332,7 +332,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ct_idle_exit);
>>   * If your architecture's idle loop does do upcalls to user mode (or does
>>   * anything else that results in unbalanced calls to the irq_enter() and
>>   * irq_exit() functions), RCU will give you what you deserve, good and hard.
>> - * But very infrequently and irreproducibly.
>> + * But very infrequently and irreproducible.
>
>OK, I will bite...  Don't both these words need to be in adverb form?
>What am I missing?
>
I think I missed the mark and misconceived. Sorry about the noise.

>							Thanx, Paul
>
>>   *
>>   * Use things like work queues to work around this limitation.
>>   *
>> --
>> 2.53.0
>>

--
Thanks,
Bhaskar

"Here's looking at you kid"-- Casablanca
https://about.me/unixbhaskar