From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
To: ZongYao.Chen@linux.alibaba.com
Cc: Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@gmx.de>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
Nayna Jain <nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Tianjia Zhang <tianjia.zhang@linux.alibaba.com>,
linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tpm: eventlog: tpm2: allow event log entries ending at the log boundary
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2026 07:06:45 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aiY_1doMftc_2WRp@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260604025356.3436943-1-ZongYao.Chen@linux.alibaba.com>
On Thu, Jun 04, 2026 at 10:53:47AM +0800, ZongYao.Chen@linux.alibaba.com wrote:
> From: Zongyao Chen <ZongYao.Chen@linux.alibaba.com>
>
> The TPM2 firmware event log buffer is a half-open range:
> [bios_event_log, bios_event_log_end). An entry ending exactly at
> bios_event_log_end is still inside the buffer; only an entry extending
> past that address is malformed.
>
> The TPM2 seq_file iterator did not handle this boundary consistently.
> The TCG_EfiSpecIdEvent header had to satisfy "addr + size < limit".
> Later events were rejected when "addr + size >= limit". Firmware that
> packs the final measurement tightly at the end of the log can therefore
> lose that measurement. If it is the first measurement after the spec ID
> header, binary_bios_measurements shows only the header.
>
> This has been observed on bare-metal systems whose UEFI enables the SM3
> PCR bank, but the bug is not SM3-specific. Any tightly packed TPM2 log
> whose final event ends at bios_event_log_end can hit it.
>
> Accept entries that end exactly at the log boundary by rejecting only
> "addr + size > limit". An accepted boundary entry has its last byte at
> limit - 1, so this does not allow reading past the buffer. Keep
> zero-length entries rejected.
>
> Also treat addr >= limit as EOF in tpm2_bios_measurements_start().
> After seq_file restarts from a later position, start() can scan past a
> valid final entry and leave addr equal to bios_event_log_end. That
> address is the end marker, not another event header.
>
> Leave the "marker >= limit" check in tpm2_bios_measurements_next()
> unchanged. There, marker is already the start of the next event, so
> "marker == limit" means EOF.
This is the most unclear bug description I've read for a long
time. Please explain what's the problem in simple teerms and
how this solves this. Mixing up pseudo-code and text does not
help.
>
> Fixes: 4d23cc323cdb ("tpm: add securityfs support for TPM 2.0 firmware event log")
> Signed-off-by: Zongyao Chen <ZongYao.Chen@linux.alibaba.com>
> ---
> drivers/char/tpm/eventlog/tpm2.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/eventlog/tpm2.c b/drivers/char/tpm/eventlog/tpm2.c
> index 37a05800980c..6b65d872e43a 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/eventlog/tpm2.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/eventlog/tpm2.c
> @@ -54,31 +54,38 @@ static void *tpm2_bios_measurements_start(struct seq_file *m, loff_t *pos)
> size = struct_size(event_header, event, event_header->event_size);
>
> if (*pos == 0) {
> - if (addr + size < limit) {
> - if ((event_header->event_type == 0) &&
> - (event_header->event_size == 0))
> - return NULL;
> - return SEQ_START_TOKEN;
> - }
> + if (addr + size > limit)
> + return NULL;
> + if (event_header->event_type == 0 &&
> + event_header->event_size == 0)
> + return NULL;
> + return SEQ_START_TOKEN;
This looks unnecessary turnover. Please rethink. We should be minizing
the diff for bug fixes, not the other way around.
> }
>
> if (*pos > 0) {
> addr += size;
> + if (addr >= limit)
> + return NULL;
> event = addr;
> size = calc_tpm2_event_size(event, event_header);
> - if ((addr + size >= limit) || (size == 0))
> + if ((addr + size > limit) || size == 0)
> return NULL;
> }
>
> for (i = 0; i < (*pos - 1); i++) {
> + if (addr >= limit)
> + return NULL;
> event = addr;
> size = calc_tpm2_event_size(event, event_header);
>
> - if ((addr + size >= limit) || (size == 0))
> + if ((addr + size > limit) || size == 0)
> return NULL;
> addr += size;
> }
>
> + if (addr >= limit)
> + return NULL;
> +
> return addr;
> }
>
> @@ -115,7 +122,7 @@ static void *tpm2_bios_measurements_next(struct seq_file *m, void *v,
> event = v;
>
> event_size = calc_tpm2_event_size(event, event_header);
> - if (((v + event_size) >= limit) || (event_size == 0))
> + if (((v + event_size) > limit) || event_size == 0)
> return NULL;
>
> return v;
> --
> 2.47.3
>
BR, Jarkko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-08 4:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-04 2:53 ZongYao.Chen
2026-06-08 4:06 ` Jarkko Sakkinen [this message]
2026-06-09 9:05 ` ZongYao.Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aiY_1doMftc_2WRp@kernel.org \
--to=jarkko@kernel.org \
--cc=ZongYao.Chen@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterhuewe@gmx.de \
--cc=tianjia.zhang@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox