mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Cheng <icheng@nvidia.com>
To: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
Cc: Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@amd.com>,
	dave@stgolabs.net,  jic23@kernel.org, alison.schofield@intel.com,
	vishal.l.verma@intel.com,  ira.weiny@intel.com, djbw@kernel.org,
	ming.li@zohomail.com, rrichter@amd.com,
	 Benjamin.Cheatham@amd.com,
	Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@amd.com, stable@vger.kernel.org,
	 linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	 PradeepVineshReddy.Kodamati@amd.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] cxl/port: Fix missing port lock in cxl_dport_remove()
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2026 15:40:45 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aifBp346jcVZ6sgi@MWDK4CY14F> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <be149ddc-702b-46c2-b6a7-d9195aee0eee@intel.com>

On Mon, Jun 08, 2026 at 05:35:23PM +0800, Dave Jiang wrote:
> 
> 
> On 6/8/26 3:35 PM, Terry Bowman wrote:
> > xa_erase() in cxl_dport_remove() runs without the port device lock,
> > creating a race with any caller that does xa_load() on port->dports
> > and then dereferences the returned dport pointer. A concurrent
> > cxl_dport_remove() can erase and free the dport between the xa_load()
> > and the caller acquiring the port lock, causing a use-after-free.
> > 
> > For non-root ports the port lock is already held by the caller on two
> > paths:
> > 
> > 1. Driver unbind: devres_release_all() is called from
> >    __device_release_driver() which holds port->dev.mutex.
> > 
> > 2. Dynamic endpoint removal: cxl_detach_ep() takes the port lock
> >    before calling del_dports() -> del_dport() -> devres_release_group(),
> >    which synchronously runs cxl_dport_remove().
> > 
> > Use cond_cxl_root_lock/unlock(), which only acquires the port lock when
> > the port is a root port and the lock is therefore not already held.
> > This matches the pattern used in __devm_cxl_add_dport() for the same
> > reason.
> > 
> > The write-side fix to cxl_dport_remove() is necessary but not
> > sufficient. Callers that obtain a dport pointer via cxl_mem_find_port()
> > use a lockless xa_load() and must not dereference that pointer until a
> > lock that excludes free_dport()/kfree() is held.
> >

Hi Terry,

I think the mechanism is right, cond_cxl_root_lock() in cxl_dport_remove()
is a no-op for non-root ports and a real qcquire only for root dports, so
no deadlock.

But this only cover the 2 cxl_mem_find_port() callers. The sibling
cxl_pci_find_port() has similar lockless xa_load() plus deref, and those
callers aren't fied.

Could you either extend the same fix in this series?
I'm happy to send a follow-up for other readers if that's easier for you.

> > For root ports, dport_to_host() returns uport_dev, so all three devres
> > actions (free_dport, cxl_dport_remove, cxl_dport_unlink) are registered
> > on uport_dev. __device_release_driver() holds uport_dev->mutex for the
> > full teardown sequence including kfree(dport). Holding uport_dev->mutex
> > on the read side therefore excludes concurrent dport freeing.
> > 
> > Fix rcd_pcie_cap_emit() by passing NULL to cxl_mem_find_port() to avoid
> > capturing a lockless dport pointer, then re-fetching dport inside the
> > uport_dev guard via cxl_find_dport_by_dev(). The previous guard on
> > root->dev was wrong: cxl_dport_remove() releases root->dev before
> > free_dport() runs, so root->dev does not protect against concurrent
> > kfree(dport).
> > 
> > Fix cxl_mem_probe() similarly: pass NULL to cxl_mem_find_port(), then
> > re-fetch dport inside scoped_guard(device, &parent_port->dev) for the
> > VH path, and re-fetch again inside scoped_guard(device, uport_dev) for
> > the RCH path. This closes both the TOCTOU window between the lockless
> > xa_load() and the guard acquisition, and the window between the two
> > sequential guards in the RCH path where a concurrent surprise removal
> > could free dport before devm_cxl_add_endpoint() dereferences it.
> > 
> > Reported-by: Sashiko
> > Fixes: 391785859e7e ("cxl/port: Move dport tracking to an xarray")
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cxl/20260505173029.2718246-1-terry.bowman@amd.com/
> > Signed-off-by: Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@amd.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Ben Cheatham <Benjamin.Cheatham@amd.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/cxl/core/port.c | 10 +++++++
> >  drivers/cxl/mem.c       | 65 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> >  drivers/cxl/pci.c       | 17 +++++++----
> >  3 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/port.c b/drivers/cxl/core/port.c
> > index c5aacd7054f1..0b8f144596e8 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cxl/core/port.c
> > +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/port.c
> > @@ -1092,8 +1092,18 @@ static void cxl_dport_remove(void *data)
> >  	struct cxl_dport *dport = data;
> >  	struct cxl_port *port = dport->port;
> >  
> > +	/*
> > +	 * For non-root ports the port lock is already held by the caller
> > +	 * via devres_release_all() during driver unbind, which holds
> > +	 * port->dev.mutex throughout.  Acquiring it again unconditionally
> > +	 * would deadlock.  Use cond_cxl_root_lock() which only acquires
> > +	 * when the port is a root port and the lock is therefore not yet
> > +	 * held.
> > +	 */
> > +	cond_cxl_root_lock(port);
> >  	port->nr_dports--;
> >  	xa_erase(&port->dports, (unsigned long) dport->dport_dev);
> > +	cond_cxl_root_unlock(port);

In the comment above, maybe worth adding some contents about this is
also what makes the RCH reads safe. It's no obvious for me.

Best regards,
Richard Cheng.

> >  	put_device(dport->dport_dev);
> >  }
> >  
> > diff --git a/drivers/cxl/mem.c b/drivers/cxl/mem.c
> > index fcffe24dcb42..345b56f215ff 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cxl/mem.c
> > +++ b/drivers/cxl/mem.c
> > @@ -70,9 +70,9 @@ static int cxl_mem_probe(struct device *dev)
> >  	struct cxl_memdev *cxlmd = to_cxl_memdev(dev);
> >  	struct cxl_memdev_state *mds = to_cxl_memdev_state(cxlmd->cxlds);
> >  	struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds = cxlmd->cxlds;
> > -	struct device *endpoint_parent;
> >  	struct cxl_dport *dport;
> >  	struct dentry *dentry;
> > +	bool rch = false;
> >  	int rc;
> >  
> >  	if (!cxlds->media_ready)
> > @@ -107,8 +107,7 @@ static int cxl_mem_probe(struct device *dev)
> >  	if (rc)
> >  		return rc;
> >  
> > -	struct cxl_port *parent_port __free(put_cxl_port) =
> > -		cxl_mem_find_port(cxlmd, &dport);
> > +	struct cxl_port *parent_port __free(put_cxl_port) = cxl_mem_find_port(cxlmd, NULL);
> >  	if (!parent_port) {
> >  		dev_err(dev, "CXL port topology not found\n");
> >  		return -ENXIO;
> > @@ -123,21 +122,57 @@ static int cxl_mem_probe(struct device *dev)
> >  		}
> >  	}
> >  
> > -	if (dport->rch)
> > -		endpoint_parent = parent_port->uport_dev;
> > -	else
> > -		endpoint_parent = &parent_port->dev;
> > -
> > -	scoped_guard(device, endpoint_parent) {
> > -		if (!endpoint_parent->driver) {
> > -			dev_err(dev, "CXL port topology %s not enabled\n",
> > -				dev_name(endpoint_parent));
> > +	scoped_guard(device, &parent_port->dev) {
> > +		/*
> > +		 * Re-fetch dport under the port lock to close the TOCTOU
> > +		 * window between cxl_mem_find_port()'s lockless xa_load() and
> > +		 * this guard acquisition.  A concurrent surprise removal can
> > +		 * free the dport in that window.
> > +		 */
> > +		dport = cxl_find_dport_by_dev(parent_port, cxlmd->dev.parent->parent);
> > +		if (!dport) {
> > +			dev_err(dev, "CXL port topology %s not found\n",
> > +				dev_name(&parent_port->dev));
> >  			return -ENXIO;
> >  		}
> > +		rch = dport->rch;
> > +
> > +		if (!rch) {
> > +			if (!parent_port->dev.driver) {
> > +				dev_err(dev, "CXL port topology %s not enabled\n",
> > +					dev_name(&parent_port->dev));
> > +				return -ENXIO;
> > +			}
> > +			rc = devm_cxl_add_endpoint(&parent_port->dev, cxlmd, dport);
> > +			if (rc)
> > +				return rc;
> > +		}
> > +	}
> >  
> > -		rc = devm_cxl_add_endpoint(endpoint_parent, cxlmd, dport);
> > -		if (rc)
> > -			return rc;
> > +	if (rch) {
> > +		struct device *uport_dev = parent_port->uport_dev;
> > +
> > +		scoped_guard(device, uport_dev) {
> > +			if (!uport_dev->driver) {
> > +				dev_err(dev, "CXL port topology %s not enabled\n",
> > +					dev_name(uport_dev));
> > +				return -ENXIO;
> > +			}
> > +			/*
> > +			 * Re-fetch dport under uport_dev lock.  uport_dev->mutex
> > +			 * is held for the full devres teardown sequence including
> > +			 * free_dport()/kfree(), so this excludes concurrent
> > +			 * hotplug removal through the entire dereference.
> > +			 */
> > +			dport = cxl_find_dport_by_dev(parent_port, cxlmd->dev.parent->parent);
> > +			if (!dport) {
> > +				dev_err(dev, "CXL RCH dport not found\n");
> > +				return -ENXIO;
> > +			}
> > +			rc = devm_cxl_add_endpoint(uport_dev, cxlmd, dport);
> > +			if (rc)
> > +				return rc;
> > +		}
> 
> Still reviewing the patch, but thoughts on moving the two new big blocks to a helper function?
> 
> DJ
> 
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	if (cxlmd->attach) {
> > diff --git a/drivers/cxl/pci.c b/drivers/cxl/pci.c
> > index bace662dc988..710a62a66429 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cxl/pci.c
> > +++ b/drivers/cxl/pci.c
> > @@ -708,10 +708,10 @@ static ssize_t rcd_pcie_cap_emit(struct device *dev, u16 offset, char *buf, size
> >  {
> >  	struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> >  	struct cxl_memdev *cxlmd = cxlds->cxlmd;
> > -	struct device *root_dev;
> >  	struct cxl_dport *dport;
> > +	struct device *root_dev;
> >  	struct cxl_port *root __free(put_cxl_port) =
> > -		cxl_mem_find_port(cxlmd, &dport);
> > +		cxl_mem_find_port(cxlmd, NULL);
> >  
> >  	if (!root)
> >  		return -ENXIO;
> > @@ -720,13 +720,20 @@ static ssize_t rcd_pcie_cap_emit(struct device *dev, u16 offset, char *buf, size
> >  	if (!root_dev)
> >  		return -ENXIO;
> >  
> > -	if (!dport->regs.rcd_pcie_cap)
> > -		return -ENXIO;
> > -
> >  	guard(device)(root_dev);
> >  	if (!root_dev->driver)
> >  		return -ENXIO;
> >  
> > +	/*
> > +	 * Fetch dport under uport_dev lock to protect against concurrent
> > +	 * hotplug removal. uport_dev->mutex is held for the entire devres
> > +	 * teardown sequence including free_dport(), so holding it here
> > +	 * excludes concurrent kfree(dport).
> > +	 */
> > +	dport = cxl_find_dport_by_dev(root, cxlmd->dev.parent->parent);
> > +	if (!dport || !dport->regs.rcd_pcie_cap)
> > +		return -ENXIO;
> > +
> >  	switch (width) {
> >  	case 2:
> >  		return sysfs_emit(buf, "%#x\n",
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-09  7:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-08 22:35 Terry Bowman
2026-06-09  0:35 ` Dave Jiang
2026-06-09  7:40   ` Richard Cheng [this message]
2026-06-09 15:12     ` Bowman, Terry
2026-06-09 16:03       ` Dave Jiang
2026-06-09 14:22   ` Bowman, Terry

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aifBp346jcVZ6sgi@MWDK4CY14F \
    --to=icheng@nvidia.com \
    --cc=Benjamin.Cheatham@amd.com \
    --cc=PradeepVineshReddy.Kodamati@amd.com \
    --cc=Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@amd.com \
    --cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
    --cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=djbw@kernel.org \
    --cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
    --cc=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ming.li@zohomail.com \
    --cc=rrichter@amd.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=terry.bowman@amd.com \
    --cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®