Re: [PATCH 2/3] iio: adc: add Axiado SARADC driver

[Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>]

On Tue, Jun 09, 2026 at 11:09:32AM +0200, Petar Stepanovic wrote:
> On 6/5/2026 8:26 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:

...

> >> +     info->clk = devm_clk_get_enabled(&pdev->dev, NULL);
> > Why no name? It will make harder for the next generations of HW in case they
> > want more than one clock to be used.
> 
> This IP block currently has only one clock input, so I used the unnamed clock.
> Since there is no ambiguity for the current hardware, I would prefer to keep
> the binding simple unless a named clock is required.

Again, it doesn't matter. What matters is the potential future. Hence it's
recommended to use named clocks even for a single case as we don't know if
the next generation will use more clocks or not. In any case, it will be
your decision and up to the maintainers.

Note, I have not checked statistics of how many of those which started with
a NULL clock become more complicated in the future, but for sure there are
more than a single case in the kernel.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko