From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C96D1345CAA for ; Fri, 12 Jun 2026 21:05:45 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1781298346; cv=none; b=MHvqEKNiwcCz+7xg81HLcFKvPQU4Zvic3QTizEesxcXNXSp2LfJxzOLKEmLMVJoZMJe6/AQoEvXXpOCcJWL7cJGauiIDhBUX8wGATqQLPgoPPug5kcb96XppxDJPK5AyacQ4sFAyf9wTmAzQh6x8+go++Q8obh+fG2ro8dDYkKs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1781298346; c=relaxed/simple; bh=GU8x6MG3Q/jAAYIyKEGADZ/7+0AJHqsxhARyFggIaF4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=dAYhQmRXSZ7Z3uyj33i1123GCDJMyY2qNQYDcfPMFH9T6jMcK76OIY+m6fqA2A6SBAJ29MPx90Jv4dwDCeDBngyU12XAMeKtAnRl9SWWi6k+rjYamXnIblruuRvaFuWHslGZutpsxSIq1aN8r5CJQbHWlDU64r5OYT3Ldx/VQNQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=a4DQkWpU; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=VlVkmFpT; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="a4DQkWpU"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="VlVkmFpT" Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2026 23:05:42 +0200 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1781298344; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=uMPkE8tUCYFUCJFo3VzvFSYRid6Bhn57BRtZb88o7g0=; b=a4DQkWpUDIJEsF0lqwgHP2Ygb0QXyseIOv0ttYlXhxtwEpGgJyGCIR4z0QJ6mNN2sCPY6z LnsxS32kX3PTZMTG+1opepUDk7QQAg7FsSm9PhAO5RxAW5FMNGDPa7vkyvcQsy/8cCDGs6 Vmt7TMvy+GvhcI71Nc0pfg1bVhYgN3DkKPJwWmtM/9x0uJjec3wG2SAvuySU4l7DzGEXyl axeKMkCSYm4S5p/0nHLSf/oIVSoNhXAZ7JpxYz+y92kn4Fi6bEs9zGoZH4NTOZmDZbq6iK x3+WfoX5BKEL37dBG7pCO/KUhLJ0lv2j7lsUyxTFt0jEMWgEte6gFU1Z0yEkaQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1781298344; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=uMPkE8tUCYFUCJFo3VzvFSYRid6Bhn57BRtZb88o7g0=; b=VlVkmFpTpywcdBpznEcH2Dzgyj1FrjkXy+afDN9OTPj07f95az3aqTehOo9JaVkgoPSlLb f+3AgPqbPz9ZP2CA== From: "Ahmed S. Darwish" To: Ethan Nelson-Moore Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Dave Hansen , x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" , David Woodhouse , Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/cpu: remove Makefile rule for removed UMC CPU support Message-ID: References: <20260610033252.164571-1-enelsonmoore@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260610033252.164571-1-enelsonmoore@gmail.com> On Tue, 09 Jun 2026, Ethan Nelson-Moore wrote: > > Support for UMC CPUs was removed in commit 7d328c5de43a ("x86/cpu: > Remove CPU_SUP_UMC_32 support"), but a Makefile rule for the support > code remained. Remove it. > > Fixes: 7d328c5de43a ("x86/cpu: Remove CPU_SUP_UMC_32 support") > Signed-off-by: Ethan Nelson-Moore > --- There is no need for mentioning the fauly commit twice, once in the log text and once at the Fixes tag. The latter is sufficient (and required.) Pretty minor, so: Reviewed-by: Ahmed S. Darwish