From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
To: Kaitao Cheng <kaitao.cheng@linux.dev>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Kaitao Cheng <chengkaitao@kylinos.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] lib/vsprintf: Make no_hash_pointers take effect early
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2026 14:05:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ajE77NVvnc0wzIrF@pathway.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260612030642.14239-1-kaitao.cheng@linux.dev>
On Fri 2026-06-12 11:06:42, Kaitao Cheng wrote:
> From: Kaitao Cheng <chengkaitao@kylinos.cn>
>
> The no_hash_pointers boot parameter is now handled as an alias for
> hash_pointers=never. However, hash_pointers=never only records the
> selected mode during early parameter parsing, and no_hash_pointers is
> not updated until hash_pointers_finalize() runs later from SLUB init.
>
> This leaves a window during very early boot where %p output is still
> hashed even though the user explicitly requested unhashed pointers with
> no_hash_pointers or hash_pointers=never.
>
> Set no_hash_pointers as soon as the "never" mode is parsed. The later
> hash_pointers_finalize() call still keeps the final policy decision in
> one place, but explicit requests to disable pointer hashing now take
> effect for early boot users too.
>
> In Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt, the descriptions
> of both no_hash_pointers and hash_pointers= are already marked as
> [KNL,EARLY], which match the current semantics.
>
> --- a/lib/vsprintf.c
> +++ b/lib/vsprintf.c
> @@ -2361,6 +2361,7 @@ static int __init hash_pointers_mode_parse(char *str)
> } else if (strcmp(str, "never") == 0) {
> pr_info("Hash pointers mode set to never.\n");
> hash_pointers_mode = HASH_PTR_NEVER;
> + no_hash_pointers = true;
> } else if (strcmp(str, "always") == 0) {
> pr_info("Hash pointers mode set to always.\n");
> hash_pointers_mode = HASH_PTR_ALWAYS;
Sashiko AI has a good point that we should reset no_hash_pointers to
false by default. It would handle the situation when the parameter
is passed more times on the command line. Aka, the last parameter
wins. See
https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260612030642.14239-1-kaitao.cheng%40linux.dev
It is not a big deal. But let's do it right when touching this.
Otherwise, the patch makes sense and looks good to me.
Best Regards,
Petr
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-16 12:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-12 3:06 Kaitao Cheng
2026-06-16 12:05 ` Petr Mladek [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ajE77NVvnc0wzIrF@pathway.suse.cz \
--to=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=chengkaitao@kylinos.cn \
--cc=kaitao.cheng@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®