mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
To: Kaitao Cheng <kaitao.cheng@linux.dev>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
	Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Kaitao Cheng <chengkaitao@kylinos.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] lib/vsprintf: Make no_hash_pointers take effect early
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2026 14:05:00 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ajE77NVvnc0wzIrF@pathway.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260612030642.14239-1-kaitao.cheng@linux.dev>

On Fri 2026-06-12 11:06:42, Kaitao Cheng wrote:
> From: Kaitao Cheng <chengkaitao@kylinos.cn>
> 
> The no_hash_pointers boot parameter is now handled as an alias for
> hash_pointers=never. However, hash_pointers=never only records the
> selected mode during early parameter parsing, and no_hash_pointers is
> not updated until hash_pointers_finalize() runs later from SLUB init.
> 
> This leaves a window during very early boot where %p output is still
> hashed even though the user explicitly requested unhashed pointers with
> no_hash_pointers or hash_pointers=never.
> 
> Set no_hash_pointers as soon as the "never" mode is parsed. The later
> hash_pointers_finalize() call still keeps the final policy decision in
> one place, but explicit requests to disable pointer hashing now take
> effect for early boot users too.
> 
> In Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt, the descriptions
> of both no_hash_pointers and hash_pointers= are already marked as
> [KNL,EARLY], which match the current semantics.
> 
> --- a/lib/vsprintf.c
> +++ b/lib/vsprintf.c
> @@ -2361,6 +2361,7 @@ static int __init hash_pointers_mode_parse(char *str)
>  	} else if (strcmp(str, "never") == 0) {
>  		pr_info("Hash pointers mode set to never.\n");
>  		hash_pointers_mode = HASH_PTR_NEVER;
> +		no_hash_pointers = true;
>  	} else if (strcmp(str, "always") == 0) {
>  		pr_info("Hash pointers mode set to always.\n");
>  		hash_pointers_mode = HASH_PTR_ALWAYS;

Sashiko AI has a good point that we should reset no_hash_pointers to
false by default. It would handle the situation when the parameter
is passed more times on the command line. Aka, the last parameter
wins. See
https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260612030642.14239-1-kaitao.cheng%40linux.dev

It is not a big deal. But let's do it right when touching this.

Otherwise, the patch makes sense and looks good to me.

Best Regards,
Petr


      reply	other threads:[~2026-06-16 12:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-12  3:06 Kaitao Cheng
2026-06-16 12:05 ` Petr Mladek [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ajE77NVvnc0wzIrF@pathway.suse.cz \
    --to=pmladek@suse.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=chengkaitao@kylinos.cn \
    --cc=kaitao.cheng@linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®