On Fri, Apr 24, 2026 at 12:00:53PM +0800, Li Wang
wrote:
> test_swapin_nozswap can hit OOM before reaching its assertions on some
> setups.
Is it because of differences in available IO or what does it depend on?
> The test currently sets memory.max=8M and then allocates/reads
> 32M with memory.zswap.max=0, which may over-constrain reclaim and kill
> the workload process.
>
> Replace hardcoded sizes with PAGE_SIZE-based values:
> - control_allocation_size = PAGE_SIZE * 512
> - memory.max = control_allocation_size * 3 / 4
> - minimum expected swap = control_allocation_size / 4
>
> This keeps the test pressure model intact (allocate/read beyond memory.max to
> force swap-in/out) while making it more robust across different environments.
I see you used allocation value that is preserve absolute values from 64k systems
test is differnt on 4k ones. Any specific reason for that?
Thanks,
Michal