mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
To: Bradley Morgan <include@grrlz.net>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
	Mayank Rungta <mrungta@google.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	Feng Tang <feng.tang@linux.alibaba.com>,
	ZhenguoYao <yaozhenguo1@gmail.com>,
	Shengming Hu <hu.shengming@zte.com.cn>,
	Joel Granados <joel.granados@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] watchdog: avoid extra sys_info dumps for all_bt
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2026 14:37:00 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ajp97LUT8rsWie74@pathway.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260620220140.15479-1-include@grrlz.net>

On Sat 2026-06-20 22:01:40, Bradley Morgan wrote:
> The watchdog handles SYS_INFO_ALL_BT itself. When that is the only
> watchdog specific bit, sys_info(0) falls back to kernel_sys_info.

Great catch!

> Skip sys_info() for that case.
> 
> Fixes: a9af76a78760 ("watchdog: add sys_info sysctls to dump sys info on system lockup")
> Signed-off-by: Bradley Morgan <include@grrlz.net>

> --- a/kernel/watchdog.c
> +++ b/kernel/watchdog.c
> @@ -54,6 +54,16 @@ static int __read_mostly watchdog_hardlockup_available;
>  struct cpumask watchdog_cpumask __read_mostly;
>  unsigned long *watchdog_cpumask_bits = cpumask_bits(&watchdog_cpumask);
>  

Similar problem exists also in kernel/panic.c. It would make
sense to put this variant into lib/sys_info.c and use a generic name,
e.g. sys_info_without_all_bt().

> +static void watchdog_sys_info(unsigned long si_mask)
> +{
> +	unsigned long dump_mask = si_mask & ~SYS_INFO_ALL_BT;
> +

This looks like an optimization. The real reason is not obvious.
It would deserve a comment, something like:

	/*
	 * Do not call sys_info() when the caller context required
	 * only backtraces from all CPUs. Otherwise, sys_info()
	 * would fall back to the generic "kernel_si_mask".
	 */
> +	if (si_mask && !dump_mask)
> +		return;
> +
> +	sys_info(dump_mask);
> +}

Alternative solution would be to remove the custom
trigger_all*_cpu_backtrace() calls from both watchdog and panic
code and rely on sys_info() API. But it is not easy, especially
in panic().

Otherwise, the changes make sense.

Best Regards,
Petr

      parent reply	other threads:[~2026-06-23 12:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-20 22:01 Bradley Morgan
2026-06-22  3:23 ` Feng Tang
2026-06-22  6:30   ` Bradley Morgan
2026-06-22  7:37     ` Feng Tang
2026-06-22 14:51       ` Bradley Morgan
2026-06-23 12:37 ` Petr Mladek [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ajp97LUT8rsWie74@pathway.suse.cz \
    --to=pmladek@suse.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dianders@chromium.org \
    --cc=feng.tang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=hu.shengming@zte.com.cn \
    --cc=include@grrlz.net \
    --cc=joel.granados@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mrungta@google.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=yaozhenguo1@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome