From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BABE230D410; Tue, 23 Jun 2026 16:10:44 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.16 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1782231046; cv=none; b=NNDEsdD3FKnD7mArfoS64rmZBUSugShx5iZ2h6l8Gyh4egKsamfYKek15Exb8RhY2DY5QxSBJWOr94V+0JLlj7dpYm/I8/navSnqtj8EGTc7hy2Q9RQMwmJuRlGack57xtfZDeyOzKiQpRuQhCQ/XkFnycdSX+1hJF35HJ+5ivc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1782231046; c=relaxed/simple; bh=wWvMXfjrWCeJKu4Ntx+JySZPuCcNrV9PPz1N5AAuDnI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=aTYqlS68MjVg6nAak8SX0E3pUVuSPQLvBFn95kZ1SJTuB+4e0YdOVQdwGvGTzdWxzpTq2fSkcyxKV0Mj3CvYhzY+egqATzx5KtwactE7ewaj8yzfiA/z1K+H+y+O1UbGydKK76NUEAae1toktKdDq4nRvgo5Tdp08sM+kYtvrmo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=E+OfX2Kx; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.16 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="E+OfX2Kx" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1782231044; x=1813767044; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=wWvMXfjrWCeJKu4Ntx+JySZPuCcNrV9PPz1N5AAuDnI=; b=E+OfX2Kx/9tiYLHFsuTuSmCo0p0K/FGPYg0UToEVD3YFyGOscvKXkN4W F8dDld6bqY6VLShQev0pJaM6TyeO1etw9Emaz/dBmvLrM9gQV5k+fGs8K ca7iwTR2LtfW/rJoL4liJOCpp7woP94G2XIH1pSpAp4h5hZzesuBSkNBv 59P7npxMynQNfDmHIt5BkAgMB9d/5x7r5719vMqJ/4xWZOMuNcaxolw9e jgKhu+46JxaUY3g3ChMecvyGG8kWqgR1eAl83HKzqhbYH7YF6uMniNq+e 3pFs/UgguOxM/lQ09LnK16c/7AINcNVc/oPjAF9AAOFqRi7BGSX5q+1yW w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: Z7ziyRg8TbGdkGfE1VwKNQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: lUaXwJ7DSI2xlULhxMcNag== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11826"; a="70495228" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.24,220,1774335600"; d="scan'208";a="70495228" Received: from fmviesa006.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.146]) by fmvoesa110.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 23 Jun 2026 09:10:44 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 7mrp2mDlRA23lQlKmJNlcQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: LJOm3gISQvaOKgOGTRO6jg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.24,220,1774335600"; d="scan'208";a="245188529" Received: from klitkey1-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.245.244.7]) by fmviesa006-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 23 Jun 2026 09:10:41 -0700 Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2026 19:10:39 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Julian Braha Cc: Andrew Jones , Sergey Senozhatsky , linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, nathan@kernel.org, nsc@kernel.org, rdunlap@infradead.org, tfiga@chromium.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] kconfig: add kconfig-sym-check static checker Message-ID: References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - c/o Alberga Business Park, 6 krs, Bertel Jungin Aukio 5, 02600 Espoo On Tue, Jun 23, 2026 at 04:25:15PM +0100, Julian Braha wrote: > On 6/23/26 16:18, Andrew Jones wrote: > > >> I wonder if you have seen KCONFIG_WARN_UNKNOWN_SYMBOLS which seem > >> to be addressing the same (or very similar) problem (unless I'm missing > >> something). > > > Thanks, Sergey. I wasn't aware of this. Is there a way to combine that > > The two tools do not do the same thing. One is a check on .config and > the other is a check on the Kconfig spec. ...otherwise Sergey should never been able to cleanly build kernels for a long time, I suppose. > Drew and Sergey, please try each other's checks. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko