mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
	bigeasy@linutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	marco.crivellari@suse.com, frederic@kernel.org,
	Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>,
	kernel-team@meta.com, kmagar@redhat.com, psuriset@redhat.com,
	david.dai@linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] workqueue: split kick_pool() into kick_pool_pick() + wake_up_q()
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2026 08:46:59 -1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ajwmI67TJwTudCnG@slm.duckdns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260624-fastwake-v4-1-7b6d7b494a44@debian.org>

On Wed, Jun 24, 2026 at 04:47:39AM -0700, Breno Leitao wrote:
> +	wake_q_add(wakeq, p);

This is two extra atomic ops for every work item scheduling. This isn't
necessarily a deal braker but is this the only way to do this? Can't you
just stash the task pointer, extend irq disabled region and wake under rcu
protection?

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-24 18:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-24 11:47 [PATCH v4 0/3] workqueue: Shrink the lock time Breno Leitao
2026-06-24 11:47 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] workqueue: split kick_pool() into kick_pool_pick() + wake_up_q() Breno Leitao
2026-06-24 18:46   ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2026-06-25 16:51     ` Breno Leitao
2026-06-24 11:47 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] workqueue: defer the worker wakeup outside pool->lock in __queue_work() Breno Leitao
2026-06-24 11:47 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] workqueue: defer the worker wakeup outside pool->lock in process_one_work() Breno Leitao
2026-06-24 15:30 ` [PATCH v4 0/3] workqueue: Shrink the lock time Sebastian Andrzej Siewior

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ajwmI67TJwTudCnG@slm.duckdns.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=david.dai@linux.dev \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=hdanton@sina.com \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=kmagar@redhat.com \
    --cc=leitao@debian.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marco.crivellari@suse.com \
    --cc=psuriset@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®