From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BBB3440F8C6 for ; Thu, 9 Jul 2026 10:13:50 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.16 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1783592032; cv=none; b=RJSS56GmXDKF9aHZpmfLIVH4GYWbW9udjRR7QADv+VNJTEOmNhVhi18AaDoXQuuiEmuWq3n+YrGiSDQDmL0Mr2FKzyGLNQO0xLdqwauL33g0o8Je99nP9rH1dkCTSOlujl52Ih/ISObIwBKTa6G2XigKCFRNQC580W8XfbkeoYI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1783592032; c=relaxed/simple; bh=OeLhPzcVXF6fMNcUxkfP3OhDENjij8/DJ/G3glukAhs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=hFATfLnyvJGlwoJBPRpDkSXUHisHPFFz/DJEnwQi+E3yZepmrYVLd2H4KROXmUKkp4UxQwzggLHyQqIuNRdD8tVDZNox80UuSxZaFpHJBKtiUJfOaInf0ZBemSusbwCNM9K0A9gI5zJ1K7RTNFY8PiVbEHySYNCsjxJEFmyNV2U= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=GHSZxmZb; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.16 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="GHSZxmZb" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1783592030; x=1815128030; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=OeLhPzcVXF6fMNcUxkfP3OhDENjij8/DJ/G3glukAhs=; b=GHSZxmZbJ2nYVv5hBXpQbcqgIWU/hLOZ1UZwC5yqf/cPkVXXL9aJqgPy plo0obI821984b/7q/3YvgW2dC6GBggLrAqjDVSY9PR/T7EjnOoozJG9a TZuhJu5hOJxcT8pBgRbMsorMVYGrOjzYKNcrs5X/t81RY+ldQMHFpkaVY mVnkM0PQILE72D+ks2A9PlheECcNxYBLO3yfzej9BJcXUP/QkR32WA+FR QsYGtkaq5HQxzEcBeD+KU6xD13adfVYKsMtS8EmqVSukswYBjUI3HFcfF 9eYtPfSmAKzi33l+qG4OKI4S/KjfXs2uMTTNEEQBDop9r2pLmnOP5dxFf w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 2NJZHX2CSe+vSEmrAh1pCw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: EnQ2GvHnQXm6yThNlmSqNg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11841"; a="71788848" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.25,154,1779174000"; d="scan'208";a="71788848" Received: from orviesa005.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.145]) by fmvoesa110.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 Jul 2026 03:13:50 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: QTwbgGMbTmmZDVIrRcAORA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: LwqxtaTVR0a5xklQA1djQA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.25,154,1779174000"; d="scan'208";a="258850037" Received: from ettammin-mobl3.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.245.245.235]) by orviesa005-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 Jul 2026 03:13:47 -0700 Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2026 13:13:45 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Petr Mladek Cc: Anshuman Khandual , linux-mm@kvack.org, usama.arif@linux.dev, hughd@google.com, willy@infradead.org, ryan.roberts@arm.com, "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] mm: Standardize printing for pgtable entries Message-ID: References: <20260709044334.1741263-1-anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - c/o Alberga Business Park, 6 krs, Bertel Jungin Aukio 5, 02600 Espoo On Thu, Jul 09, 2026 at 01:11:46PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Thu, Jul 09, 2026 at 11:15:27AM +0200, Petr Mladek wrote: > > On Thu 2026-07-09 10:40:43, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > On Thu, Jul 09, 2026 at 10:13:34AM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote: ... > > But maybe you had something particular in mind. > > Yes, I was thinking of a wrapper on top of special_hex_number(). It takes size > as an argument and hence will work even for 128-bit cases. Okay, the argument is limited to 64-bit in there. But I don't think it's a big impediment. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko