From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E9DF426691; Mon, 29 Jun 2026 15:15:31 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.13 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1782746132; cv=none; b=DVYls4jbjbYQe3GLrnyHcisULInZLGDi/FCbe9TjIYpVEDpzA11aBqBdANayHGGgarfnBh8HTAgBHzlU4qhHguoyIQrijYMIL4wO9jUBtgMk82YCg6KQyFmnm6kAcUH9SROKwi+JDN/jpesMgC4KLej7PmW23IidcFuHlIScCAs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1782746132; c=relaxed/simple; bh=wdzGryGJXKi/hHuPN7L/AmS0QCPPOlS6W1rJcjiYE1s=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=iLoR/JqL4FR4H9Y4Y6zoIUFYCBSDTm/qANYb0VrprU77q8lP/VBOXSbRN+8x54xo7QfJJuM0DGDNH5N6H8X6TGD1q7O91E5ZIvfA5ETUKJGDbflZN7O3FhaWLN6KmI8ZnKrxaqo+QC0OT5qBszNCOhiKyWjuVy4ENzyvlrGsOIU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=YmU09thu; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.13 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="YmU09thu" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1782746131; x=1814282131; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=wdzGryGJXKi/hHuPN7L/AmS0QCPPOlS6W1rJcjiYE1s=; b=YmU09thu3zutn4upRj453+R5CxM/Y/AEJxC6xBKLv5ISlXrb9hSIbt2M jZrGUzdAf1QHPLMpMzmt0DvpSJg1hk83ok4pQu6rMbwriDlUH2X5+v/S+ 11Vzg8jqafWdNrkHBP8Lc3YV95a72sqw4WSGfl/oGdMxQmI6BgRDEzQNF lxYmZUM025i+fDfY8xntGOR5CuA8KWWUv9Vw1zDbOLqryW23Mw0B++vUF MuA0DufrA++QeDLJG4JTsSjnGLfXPmPcXlkI9yr26EOdqxKIYKRfI4Oxn DUux5+i3PFFugdLoHCQ8TUqAzrFWR1PWutMQcL8hbCvJgNoX57H9fDACD Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: nxwKfY6mScuN+1cFj+CbkA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 7QSh7J9AThyaCjWRCE7Wcw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11832"; a="94591442" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.24,232,1774335600"; d="scan'208";a="94591442" Received: from orviesa002.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.142]) by orvoesa105.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 29 Jun 2026 08:14:26 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: CaeBuvTsRguVFv1TMfb2nQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: R72cGVW/T7KMySNl1UQU8Q== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.24,232,1774335600"; d="scan'208";a="282055689" Received: from kniemiec-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.245.244.207]) by orviesa002-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 29 Jun 2026 08:14:24 -0700 Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2026 18:14:22 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Ricardo Ribalda Cc: Andy Shevchenko , Hans de Goede , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Sakari Ailus , Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] media: atomisp: Demote all kernel-doc comments Message-ID: References: <20260629-atomisp-kerneldoc-simple-v1-0-8ae282b85c5c@chromium.org> <20260629-atomisp-kerneldoc-simple-v1-2-8ae282b85c5c@chromium.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260629-atomisp-kerneldoc-simple-v1-2-8ae282b85c5c@chromium.org> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - c/o Alberga Business Park, 6 krs, Bertel Jungin Aukio 5, 02600 Espoo On Mon, Jun 29, 2026 at 11:48:29AM +0000, Ricardo Ribalda wrote: > Despite the fact that kernel-doc does not emit warning for these > comments, it is much more consistent if we keep the marker /** > exclusively for kernel-doc. I see valid kernel doc in many places, please reconsider touching only controversial cases. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko