From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B8B9A3FBEB9; Tue, 30 Jun 2026 10:51:48 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1782816717; cv=none; b=Ws5rVFRzA8af5fVCDfnZVMb7mWPnSTQLD4Pd1MQ2JAg9QhHRqWsOumdbFPDlNaSa806pZJ5QCY4xMbOiKXASQg4TGB6y3esWoNASEi0pDg2IxmbEsUrWXSsL62VpW1OOFvNABkwZjkHCIYKHwtxI8xhNzIM55kR30QGdl4YMNSw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1782816717; c=relaxed/simple; bh=t3KLlyy/JqupcBXRQMag42bOWd2ihCRnoKD9RX4B6co=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=uDQerDWwykYP8R2v38iIaQtCRvCVlqHFDyUsDWK1Zdp811KOzi7oe5Hcf3mdaW9bcb7NMo4hBFdCszV38RIHYIQd9j09VHG3eJFhxcpoguthvd9CDIj0w2rAORiyMVYppZKvGSFzBfWQ0sUzcBZCBtqUn6IRkX8yIOBHOtcGcJU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=B1u/Y2Pf; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="B1u/Y2Pf" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A8AA31F00A3A; Tue, 30 Jun 2026 10:51:42 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1782816707; bh=LSagnXkfjr27HV2tQfAz+rj7AUU5/hzRn7I5KK3CMLU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=B1u/Y2Pf6zMk7tnbTzi4v6nU2Lv2weLjO53pAUXXJHjaSnLhV3I5y/EU4ZQI2Ms8y s7aCEHs5W1c7/Xqrm428GfYbtuEYXFNpcaZi6NuVn5iPNk8vFMEz4RCD2HVTiSHZic +PbRGt49XhFnG50RlWiHtmRFq97MIDncdkWoc21g8UP9tcviNTjNyN0Cz2Y4R2GxEV F5w5AA+32iv+09J11nDfNsQTIJ3TUdwGbllDMnKejLr9iYGbIcm9lgJEHJC1Lfqp5b 3x+g7YwFCe8wuwkIZIzl8vuFrD0OpK1/LuyJfMFn3QUaR/mmPuExwJ8jZIw3x7KL9a 2BoQHjkpr8SXQ== Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2026 12:51:39 +0200 From: Lorenzo Pieralisi To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Len Brown , Sunil V L , Marc Zyngier , Thomas Gleixner , Huacai Chen , Anup Patel , Hanjun Guo , Sudeep Holla , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, loongarch@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] irqchip/gic-v5: Enable GICv5 IWB ACPI probe ordering detection Message-ID: References: <20260603-gic-v5-acpi-iwb-probe-deferral-v2-0-23ffa16b6ebb@kernel.org> <20260603-gic-v5-acpi-iwb-probe-deferral-v2-6-23ffa16b6ebb@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Mon, Jun 08, 2026 at 07:18:15PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: [...] > > +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI > > + if (has_acpi_companion(&pdev->dev)) > > + acpi_dev_clear_dependencies(ACPI_COMPANION(&pdev->dev)); > > +#endif > > I would rather add a wrapper for this, along with an empty stub for > the !CONFIG_ACPI case. #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI static inline void acpi_device_clear_dep(struct device *dev) { if (has_acpi_companion(dev)) acpi_dev_clear_dependencies(ACPI_COMPANION(dev)); } #else static inline void acpi_device_clear_dep(struct device *dev) {} #endif Something like that ? Thanks, Lorenzo