From: Richard Cheng <icheng@nvidia.com>
To: Herve Codina <herve.codina@bootlin.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Saravana Kannan <saravanak@kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
David Rhodes <david.rhodes@cirrus.com>,
Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com>,
Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com>,
Linus Walleij <linusw@kernel.org>, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
Daniel Scally <djrscally@gmail.com>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>,
Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
Dan Williams <djbw@kernel.org>, Ira Weiny <iweiny@kernel.org>,
Li Ming <ming.li@zohomail.com>, Lizhi Hou <lizhi.hou@amd.com>,
driver-core@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-sound@vger.kernel.org,
patches@opensource.cirrus.com, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org,
Allan Nielsen <allan.nielsen@microchip.com>,
Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>,
Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@microchip.com>,
Steen Hegelund <steen.hegelund@microchip.com>,
Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 7/8] PCI: of: Set fwnode device of newly created PCI device nodes
Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2026 12:02:35 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <akXg4G4ksietvkwE@MWDK4CY14F> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260630102804.413563-8-herve.codina@bootlin.com>
On Tue, Jun 30, 2026 at 12:28:01PM +0800, Herve Codina wrote:
> Device-tree node can be created when CONFIG_PCI_DYNAMIC_OF_NODES. Those
> nodes are created and filled based on PCI core information but the
> fwnode device field is not set.
>
> When later an overlay is applied, this confuses fw_devlink. Indeed,
> without any device attached to the node, fw_devlink considers that this
> node will never become a device. When this node is pointed as a
> supplier, devlink looks at its ancestors in order to find a node with a
> device that could be used as the supplier.
>
> In the PCI use case, this leads to links that wrongly use the PCI root
> bridge device as the supplier instead of the expected PCI device.
>
> Setting the fwnode device to the device of the PCI device allows devlink
> to use this device as a supplier and so, correct links are created.
>
> Fixes: 407d1a51921e ("PCI: Create device tree node for bridge")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Herve Codina <herve.codina@bootlin.com>
> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> ---
> drivers/pci/of.c | 7 +++++++
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/of.c b/drivers/pci/of.c
> index ee9eb384b377..eda14cefca5e 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/of.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/of.c
> @@ -709,6 +709,13 @@ void of_pci_make_dev_node(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> if (ret)
> goto out_free_node;
>
> + /*
> + * Set the fwnode device in order to have fw_devlink creating links
> + * pointing to this PCI device instead of walking up to the PCI host
> + * bridge.
> + */
> + fw_devlink_set_device(&np->fwnode, &pdev->dev);
> +
> ret = of_changeset_apply(cset);
> if (ret)
> goto out_free_node;
> --
> 2.54.0
>
>
Hi Herve,
I wonder if this part has some issue, it sets np->fwnode.dev = &pdev->dev,
but I don't see am matching clear on removal path, I doubt the back-pointer
can outlive the pci_dev.
device_del() do the check
"""
if (dev->fwnode && dev->fwnode->dev == dev)
fw_devlink_set_device(dev->fwnode, NULL);
"""
On removal, pci_stop_dev() calls of_pci_remove_node() before pci_destroy_dev()
calls device_del(), and of_pci_remove_node() -> device_remove_of_node() has already NULLed pdev->dev.fwnode by then, so the "dev->fwnode" guard is false, and
of_pci_remove_node() itself never clears np->fwnode.dev
If something holds an extra ref on np past removal, e.g. a DT overlay applied via configfs that pins np through its gragment targets,
np survives, the pci_dev is freed, and np->fwnode.dev dnalges into freed memory.
Then fw_devlink walker that resolve it via get_dev_from_fwnode() -> get_device() would hit a use-after-free .
I think of_pci_remove_node() should cleaer the back-pointer it set,
before dropping the node's ref, e.g.
"""
np = pci_device_to_OF_node(pdev);
if (!np || !of_node_check_flag(np, OF_DYNAMIC))
return;
fw_devlink_set_device(&np->fwnode, NULL);
device_remove_of_node(&pdev->dev);
of_changeset_revert(np->data);
"""
Does that make sense to you ?
Best regards,
Richard Cheng.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-02 4:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-30 10:27 [PATCH v8 0/8] lan966x pci device: Add support for SFPs, PCI part Herve Codina
2026-06-30 10:27 ` [PATCH v8 1/8] driver core: fw_devlink: Introduce fw_devlink_set_device() Herve Codina
2026-06-30 10:27 ` [PATCH v8 2/8] drivers: core: Use fw_devlink_set_device() Herve Codina
2026-06-30 10:27 ` [PATCH v8 3/8] pinctrl: cs42l43: " Herve Codina
2026-06-30 10:27 ` [PATCH v8 4/8] cxl/test: Use device_set_node() Herve Codina
2026-06-30 10:27 ` [PATCH v8 5/8] cxl/test: Use fw_devlink_set_device() Herve Codina
2026-06-30 10:28 ` [PATCH v8 6/8] PCI: of: " Herve Codina
2026-06-30 10:28 ` [PATCH v8 7/8] PCI: of: Set fwnode device of newly created PCI device nodes Herve Codina
2026-07-02 4:02 ` Richard Cheng [this message]
2026-07-02 11:23 ` Herve Codina
2026-06-30 10:28 ` [PATCH v8 8/8] PCI: of: Remove fwnode_dev_initialized() call for a PCI root bridge node Herve Codina
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=akXg4G4ksietvkwE@MWDK4CY14F \
--to=icheng@nvidia.com \
--cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
--cc=allan.nielsen@microchip.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=daniel.machon@microchip.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=david.rhodes@cirrus.com \
--cc=djbw@kernel.org \
--cc=djrscally@gmail.com \
--cc=driver-core@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com \
--cc=herve.codina@bootlin.com \
--cc=horatiu.vultur@microchip.com \
--cc=iweiny@kernel.org \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linusw@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sound@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizhi.hou@amd.com \
--cc=luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com \
--cc=ming.li@zohomail.com \
--cc=patches@opensource.cirrus.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rf@opensource.cirrus.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com \
--cc=saravanak@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=steen.hegelund@microchip.com \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®