mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: Wei-Lin Chang <weilin.chang@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	Oliver Upton <oupton@kernel.org>, Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>,
	Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
	Steffen Eiden <seiden@linux.ibm.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>,
	Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>,
	Sebastian Ene <sebastianene@google.com>,
	Vincent Donnefort <vdonnefort@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: arm64: ptdump: Flush the last region
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2026 13:37:51 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <al4Wn4Wb6GrOAw70@J2N7QTR9R3.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <n5yni7vnama2ok2uzmhahrghrioqjbpcqui44v367rqc57qzqu@wfnio5stdmp3>

On Mon, Jul 20, 2026 at 11:58:44AM +0100, Wei-Lin Chang wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2026 at 09:35:01AM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 18, 2026 at 12:12:33AM +0100, Wei-Lin Chang wrote:
> > > @@ -155,11 +155,13 @@ static int kvm_ptdump_guest_show(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
> > >  		.seq		= m,
> > >  	};
> > >  
> > > -	write_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
> > > +	guard(write_lock)(&kvm->mmu_lock);
> > >  	ret = kvm_pgtable_walk(mmu->pgt, 0, BIT(mmu->pgt->ia_bits), &walker);
> > > -	write_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
> > > +	if (ret)
> > > +		return ret;
> > > +	note_page(&st->parser_state.ptdump, BIT(mmu->pgt->ia_bits), -1, 0);
> > 
> > This can be:
> > 
> > 	note_page_flush(&st->parser_state.ptdump);
> > 
> > The level change alone should trigger the dump, so the address doesn't
> > need to be at the end of the guest IPA space.
> > 
> > Importantly, note_page_flush() will pass 0 as the address, which won't
> > trigger the checks you try to suppress below.
> > 
> > Please use note_page_flush() here, and drop the changes to
> > arch/arm64/mm/ptdump.c.
> 
> Sorry, I shouldn't have omitted this information, but I did try
> note_page_flush(). And it gives something like this in the last row:
> 
> 0x00000000ffc00000-0x0000000000000000   17592186040324M 2   R W px ux  AF BLK
> 
> The astronomical size is from (addr - st->start_address). As IA bits for
> stage-2 are not close to 64, we'll have large sizes for the last row.

Ok. That's a bug in the current implementation of note_page_flush(),
then. The *intent* is that note_page_flush() is used to terminate
output, and we should mak it work.

Do we need to pass additional information, or do we have the necessary
values in (or accessible from) struct ptdump_state?

> That's one of the reasons I chose to call note_page() with
> BIT(pgtable->ia_bits) as addr, to end the ptdump at the end of the guest
> IPA space.
> 
> Additionally, the last row is combining two ranges:
> 
> 1. 0x00000000ffc00000-0x0000000100000000   4M       2    R W px ux  AF BLK
> 2. 0x0000000100000000-0x0000000000000000   BIG_SIZE -    (empty prot)
> 
> The attributes are wrong for the large range after
> BIT(pgtable->ia_bits). This is because before dumping the last row, the
> ptdump code is waiting to be notified of the end of the final region
> with all those {R, W, px, ux, AF, BLK} attributes. Using
> note_page_flush() essentially tells it the valid range ends at 1 << 64.
> So actually using note_page() with BIT(pgtable->ia_bits) is required for
> correctness.
> 
> The kernel ptdump is not affected by this (at least from my quick test):
> 
> 0xffffffffff6fe000-0xffffffffff800000        1032K PTE
> 0xffffffffff800000-0x0000000000000000           8M PMD

Yes, it's not affected because its final VA is 0xffffffffffffffff (i.e.
2^64i - 1), and so using 0 as the next address does the right thing
modulo 64 bits.

We use ptdump for non-kernel tables today (e.g. the EFI mm), so
presumably they suffer the same problem?

Mark.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-07-20 12:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-17 23:12 Wei-Lin Chang
2026-07-20  8:35 ` Mark Rutland
2026-07-20 10:58   ` Wei-Lin Chang
2026-07-20 11:08     ` Wei-Lin Chang
2026-07-20 12:37     ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2026-07-20 21:21       ` Wei-Lin Chang
2026-07-20  8:53 ` Dev Jain
2026-07-20  9:03   ` Marc Zyngier
2026-07-20  9:10     ` Dev Jain
2026-07-20  9:30       ` Dev Jain

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=al4Wn4Wb6GrOAw70@J2N7QTR9R3.cambridge.arm.com \
    --to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
    --cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=oupton@kernel.org \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=sebastianene@google.com \
    --cc=seiden@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=tabba@google.com \
    --cc=vdonnefort@google.com \
    --cc=weilin.chang@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®