mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
To: Bradley Morgan <include@grrlz.net>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, feng.tang@linux.alibaba.com,
	sashiko-bot@kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] panic: fix redirect CPU race in panic_try_force_cpu()
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2026 17:22:59 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpI019MV7idCZ1O@pathway.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260714173103.11585-2-include@grrlz.net>

On Tue 2026-07-14 17:31:00, Bradley Morgan wrote:
> The cmpxchg() in panic_try_force_cpu() makes sure that only one CPU
> tries to redirect panic() to the requested CPU. It is similar to the
> cmpxchg() in panic_try_start() which makes sure that only one CPU does
> the panic(). In both situations, only the winner of cmpxchg() should
> proceed further. Other CPUs should go offline.
> 
> There is a bug because the cmpxchg loser returns false and falls through
> into vpanic(). Two non-target CPUs A and B panic, the requested CPU is C:
> 
>              cpu A                          cpu B
>           ----------                     ----------
>     panic()                              panic()
>     vpanic()                             vpanic()
>     panic_try_force_cpu()                panic_try_force_cpu()
>         cmpxchg wins                        cmpxchg fails
>         redirect = A                        old_cpu = A
>         IPI -> C                            return false      <- BUG
>         return true                     panic_try_start() wins
>     panic_smp_self_stop()                __crash_kexec() on B
>     (A stops)                            (target C bypassed)
> 
> The loser must stop, not fall through. It cannot just return true,
> though. A CPU that already won the redirect cmpxchg can reenter
> panic_try_force_cpu() on the same CPU, for example a nested NMI during
> the message formatting, before the IPI is sent:
> 
>              cpu A (1st)                  cpu A (nested)
>           ----------                     ----------
>     panic()
>     vpanic()
>     panic_try_force_cpu()
>         cmpxchg wins (redirect = A)
>         vsnprintf(msg) ...
>             <-- NMI, nested panic -->
>                                      panic()
>                                      vpanic()
>                                      panic_try_force_cpu()
>                                          cmpxchg fails
>                                          old_cpu == A (this CPU)
>                                          return true   <- would halt
>                                      panic_smp_self_stop()
>                                      (IPI never sent, panic abandoned)
> 
> Check old_cpu against this_cpu so a second call from the same CPU
> returns false and falls through to panic_try_start() instead.
> 
> Also fix the panic_in_progress() check. We must not redirect when
> panic_cpu is already assigned. Return true to stop when the panic is on
> another CPU, false to proceed when it is this one.
> 
> Reported-by: Sashiko <sashiko-bot@kernel.org>
> Closes: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260705164123.18746-1-include@grrlz.net
> Closes: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260707172252.4842-1-include@grrlz.net
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Bradley Morgan <include@grrlz.net>

> --- a/kernel/panic.c
> +++ b/kernel/panic.c
> @@ -396,16 +396,20 @@ static bool panic_try_force_cpu(const char *fmt, va_list args)
>  		return false;
>  	}
>  
> -	/* Another panic already in progress */
> +	/*
> +	 * Don't redirect when a panic is already in progress. Stop this
> +	 * CPU when it's another one, proceed when it's this one.
> +	 */
>  	if (panic_in_progress())
> -		return false;
> +		return !panic_on_this_cpu();

Nit: I would use

		return panic_on_other_cpu();

It is more straightforward. The negative logic just added an extra
step for understanding the code.

Otherwise, it looks good to me.

With the proposed change:

Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>

Best Regards,
Petr

  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-17 15:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-14 17:30 [PATCH v4 0/3] panic: fix the panic_force_cpu redirect races Bradley Morgan
2026-07-14 17:31 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] panic: fix redirect CPU race in panic_try_force_cpu() Bradley Morgan
2026-07-17 15:22   ` Petr Mladek [this message]
2026-07-14 17:31 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] panic: flatten nmi_panic control flow Bradley Morgan
2026-07-17 15:16   ` Petr Mladek
2026-07-17 15:20     ` Bradley Morgan
2026-07-14 17:31 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] panic: allow force_cpu redirect from an NMI Bradley Morgan
2026-07-17 15:44   ` Petr Mladek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpI019MV7idCZ1O@pathway.suse.cz \
    --to=pmladek@suse.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=feng.tang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=include@grrlz.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox