From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
To: Bradley Morgan <include@grrlz.net>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, feng.tang@linux.alibaba.com,
sashiko-bot@kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] panic: fix redirect CPU race in panic_try_force_cpu()
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2026 17:22:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpI019MV7idCZ1O@pathway.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260714173103.11585-2-include@grrlz.net>
On Tue 2026-07-14 17:31:00, Bradley Morgan wrote:
> The cmpxchg() in panic_try_force_cpu() makes sure that only one CPU
> tries to redirect panic() to the requested CPU. It is similar to the
> cmpxchg() in panic_try_start() which makes sure that only one CPU does
> the panic(). In both situations, only the winner of cmpxchg() should
> proceed further. Other CPUs should go offline.
>
> There is a bug because the cmpxchg loser returns false and falls through
> into vpanic(). Two non-target CPUs A and B panic, the requested CPU is C:
>
> cpu A cpu B
> ---------- ----------
> panic() panic()
> vpanic() vpanic()
> panic_try_force_cpu() panic_try_force_cpu()
> cmpxchg wins cmpxchg fails
> redirect = A old_cpu = A
> IPI -> C return false <- BUG
> return true panic_try_start() wins
> panic_smp_self_stop() __crash_kexec() on B
> (A stops) (target C bypassed)
>
> The loser must stop, not fall through. It cannot just return true,
> though. A CPU that already won the redirect cmpxchg can reenter
> panic_try_force_cpu() on the same CPU, for example a nested NMI during
> the message formatting, before the IPI is sent:
>
> cpu A (1st) cpu A (nested)
> ---------- ----------
> panic()
> vpanic()
> panic_try_force_cpu()
> cmpxchg wins (redirect = A)
> vsnprintf(msg) ...
> <-- NMI, nested panic -->
> panic()
> vpanic()
> panic_try_force_cpu()
> cmpxchg fails
> old_cpu == A (this CPU)
> return true <- would halt
> panic_smp_self_stop()
> (IPI never sent, panic abandoned)
>
> Check old_cpu against this_cpu so a second call from the same CPU
> returns false and falls through to panic_try_start() instead.
>
> Also fix the panic_in_progress() check. We must not redirect when
> panic_cpu is already assigned. Return true to stop when the panic is on
> another CPU, false to proceed when it is this one.
>
> Reported-by: Sashiko <sashiko-bot@kernel.org>
> Closes: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260705164123.18746-1-include@grrlz.net
> Closes: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260707172252.4842-1-include@grrlz.net
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Bradley Morgan <include@grrlz.net>
> --- a/kernel/panic.c
> +++ b/kernel/panic.c
> @@ -396,16 +396,20 @@ static bool panic_try_force_cpu(const char *fmt, va_list args)
> return false;
> }
>
> - /* Another panic already in progress */
> + /*
> + * Don't redirect when a panic is already in progress. Stop this
> + * CPU when it's another one, proceed when it's this one.
> + */
> if (panic_in_progress())
> - return false;
> + return !panic_on_this_cpu();
Nit: I would use
return panic_on_other_cpu();
It is more straightforward. The negative logic just added an extra
step for understanding the code.
Otherwise, it looks good to me.
With the proposed change:
Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Best Regards,
Petr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-17 15:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-14 17:30 [PATCH v4 0/3] panic: fix the panic_force_cpu redirect races Bradley Morgan
2026-07-14 17:31 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] panic: fix redirect CPU race in panic_try_force_cpu() Bradley Morgan
2026-07-17 15:22 ` Petr Mladek [this message]
2026-07-14 17:31 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] panic: flatten nmi_panic control flow Bradley Morgan
2026-07-17 15:16 ` Petr Mladek
2026-07-17 15:20 ` Bradley Morgan
2026-07-14 17:31 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] panic: allow force_cpu redirect from an NMI Bradley Morgan
2026-07-17 15:44 ` Petr Mladek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpI019MV7idCZ1O@pathway.suse.cz \
--to=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=feng.tang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=include@grrlz.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox