From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933728AbXIBSEu (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Sep 2007 14:04:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754073AbXIBSEW (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Sep 2007 14:04:22 -0400 Received: from ns2.g-housing.de ([81.169.133.75]:49606 "EHLO mail.g-house.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752293AbXIBSEV (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Sep 2007 14:04:21 -0400 Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2007 20:04:09 +0200 (CEST) From: Christian Kujau X-X-Sender: evil@sheep.housecafe.de To: Stephen Hemminger cc: Christian Kujau , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, johannes@sipsolutions.net Subject: Re: RTNL: assertion failed at net/core/dev.c In-Reply-To: <20070902171300.2f4814d1@oldman> Message-ID: References: <20070902171300.2f4814d1@oldman> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 2 Sep 2007, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > Vendor module calls kernel api incorrectly. dev_set_promiscuity requires > that the calling thread hold rtnl mutex (ie call rtnl_lock). It's their bug, > netdev doesn't want to hear about it. OK, that's all I needed to know. Thank you both for your comments! Christian. -- BOFH excuse #435: Internet shut down due to maintenance