From: Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.25-rc hangs
Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2008 19:49:36 +0100 (CET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.00.0803091934090.5349@sheep.housecafe.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47D42AD6.10500@sandeen.net>
On Sun, 9 Mar 2008, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> I meant the test you were using to determine "good" from "bad" - I guess
> it was "boot up and do IO for a while to see if it hangs"
Maybe I was too confusing, let me try again:
* 2.6.24.1 was running fine for weeks (and is now)
* 2.6.25-rc3, -rc4 comes with system hang. Trying to bisect it failed
at a really early stage:
[check out current -git, 2.6.25-rc4)
$ git bisect start
$ git bisect bad # because I know, that current -git is bad
$ git bisect good v2.6.24 # because I know 2.6.24 is good
[ compiling, and first reboot]
-> failed, because hard lockup.
After rebooting to a working kernel I can now do either:
1) mark the current one as "bad", solely on the fact that "it does not
boot" and is "bad" per se, ignoring the fact that if the box *had*
booted, the system hang *perhaps* did not occur. IOW, I'm marking
it "bad" because of a totally different issue.
2) although booting failed, I still mark it "good", which means I'm
literally *guessing* that this current kernel (bd45ac0c5daa...)
does NOT have the system hang and thus affecting all subsequent
bisects. Worst case: this guess turns out to be false and I'm bisecting
all through all ~2800 revisions without ever getting the correct "bad"
one (because they were actually all "bad").
I tried 1), but did not get any further, as the next kernel did not boot
either.
I tried 2), but did not get any further, as the next kernel did boot but
locked up when I tried to use the device mapper.
Hope that's a bit better explained than before...
Thanks,
C.
--
BOFH excuse #58:
high pressure system failure
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-09 18:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-07 20:32 INFO: task mount:11202 blocked for more than 120 seconds Christian Kujau
2008-03-07 22:40 ` David Chinner
2008-03-07 23:46 ` Christian Kujau
2008-03-08 1:54 ` Christian Kujau
2008-03-09 6:15 ` 2.6.25-rc hangs (was: INFO: task mount:11202 blocked for more than 120 seconds) Christian Kujau
2008-03-09 16:44 ` 2.6.25-rc hangs Eric Sandeen
2008-03-09 18:05 ` Christian Kujau
[not found] ` <47D42AD6.10500@sandeen.net>
2008-03-09 18:49 ` Christian Kujau [this message]
2008-03-12 18:06 ` Samuel Tardieu
2008-03-12 21:02 ` Christian Kujau
2008-03-09 21:34 ` INFO: task mount:11202 blocked for more than 120 seconds David Chinner
2008-03-10 1:46 ` Christian Kujau
2008-03-12 18:03 ` Samuel Tardieu
2008-03-12 19:53 ` Chr
2008-03-12 23:07 ` Christian Kujau
2008-03-13 13:45 ` Christian Kujau
2008-03-13 21:33 ` Chr
2008-03-13 21:54 ` Christian Kujau
2008-03-14 0:15 ` Chr
2008-03-14 9:27 ` Milan Broz
2008-03-14 23:58 ` Christian Kujau
2008-03-16 20:33 ` David Chinner
2008-03-15 0:08 ` Chr
2008-03-15 13:32 ` [dm-crypt] " Chr
2008-03-15 21:34 ` Chr
2008-03-16 13:08 ` Christian Kujau
2008-03-17 17:36 ` Alasdair G Kergon
2008-03-17 18:36 ` Chr
2008-03-18 17:46 ` Christian Kujau
2008-03-18 0:56 ` Herbert Xu
2008-03-18 4:07 ` Milan Broz
2008-03-22 2:52 ` Christian Kujau
2008-03-27 8:21 ` Christian Kujau
2008-03-26 16:57 ` Chr
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.1.00.0803091934090.5349@sheep.housecafe.de \
--to=lists@nerdbynature.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sandeen@sandeen.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®