mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.25-rc hangs
Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2008 19:49:36 +0100 (CET)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.00.0803091934090.5349@sheep.housecafe.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47D42AD6.10500@sandeen.net>

On Sun, 9 Mar 2008, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> I meant the test you were using to determine "good" from "bad" - I guess
> it was "boot up and do IO for a while to see if it hangs"

Maybe I was too confusing, let me try again:

* 2.6.24.1 was running fine for weeks (and is now)
* 2.6.25-rc3, -rc4 comes with system hang. Trying to bisect it failed
   at a really early stage:

  [check out current -git, 2.6.25-rc4)
  $ git bisect start
  $ git bisect bad          # because I know, that current -git is bad
  $ git bisect good v2.6.24 # because I know 2.6.24 is good
  [ compiling, and first reboot]
  -> failed, because hard lockup.

After rebooting to a working kernel I can now do either:

  1) mark the current one as "bad", solely on the fact that "it does not
    boot" and is "bad" per se, ignoring the fact that if the box *had*
    booted, the system hang *perhaps* did not occur. IOW, I'm marking
    it "bad" because of a totally different issue.

  2) although booting failed, I still mark it "good", which means I'm
    literally *guessing* that this current kernel (bd45ac0c5daa...)
    does NOT have the system hang and thus affecting all subsequent
    bisects. Worst case: this guess turns out to be false and I'm bisecting
    all through all ~2800 revisions without ever getting the correct "bad"
    one (because they were actually all "bad").

I tried 1), but did not get any further, as the next kernel did not boot 
either.
I tried 2), but did not get any further, as the next kernel did boot but 
locked up when I tried to use the device mapper.

Hope that's a bit better explained than before...

Thanks,
C.
-- 
BOFH excuse #58:

high pressure system failure

  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-03-09 18:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-03-07 20:32 INFO: task mount:11202 blocked for more than 120 seconds Christian Kujau
2008-03-07 22:40 ` David Chinner
2008-03-07 23:46   ` Christian Kujau
2008-03-08  1:54     ` Christian Kujau
2008-03-09  6:15       ` 2.6.25-rc hangs (was: INFO: task mount:11202 blocked for more than 120 seconds) Christian Kujau
2008-03-09 16:44         ` 2.6.25-rc hangs Eric Sandeen
2008-03-09 18:05           ` Christian Kujau
     [not found]             ` <47D42AD6.10500@sandeen.net>
2008-03-09 18:49               ` Christian Kujau [this message]
2008-03-12 18:06                 ` Samuel Tardieu
2008-03-12 21:02                   ` Christian Kujau
2008-03-09 21:34     ` INFO: task mount:11202 blocked for more than 120 seconds David Chinner
2008-03-10  1:46       ` Christian Kujau
2008-03-12 18:03       ` Samuel Tardieu
2008-03-12 19:53         ` Chr
2008-03-12 23:07           ` Christian Kujau
2008-03-13 13:45             ` Christian Kujau
2008-03-13 21:33               ` Chr
2008-03-13 21:54                 ` Christian Kujau
2008-03-14  0:15                   ` Chr
2008-03-14  9:27       ` Milan Broz
2008-03-14 23:58         ` Christian Kujau
2008-03-16 20:33           ` David Chinner
2008-03-15  0:08         ` Chr
2008-03-15 13:32           ` [dm-crypt] " Chr
2008-03-15 21:34             ` Chr
2008-03-16 13:08               ` Christian Kujau
2008-03-17 17:36                 ` Alasdair G Kergon
2008-03-17 18:36                   ` Chr
2008-03-18 17:46                     ` Christian Kujau
2008-03-18  0:56                   ` Herbert Xu
2008-03-18  4:07                     ` Milan Broz
2008-03-22  2:52                   ` Christian Kujau
2008-03-27  8:21                     ` Christian Kujau
2008-03-26 16:57                   ` Chr

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.1.00.0803091934090.5349@sheep.housecafe.de \
    --to=lists@nerdbynature.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sandeen@sandeen.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®