From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757176AbYDQEQx (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Apr 2008 00:16:53 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751435AbYDQEQd (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Apr 2008 00:16:33 -0400 Received: from mail.lang.hm ([64.81.33.126]:49223 "EHLO bifrost.lang.hm" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751368AbYDQEQc (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Apr 2008 00:16:32 -0400 Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 21:22:20 -0700 (PDT) From: david@lang.hm X-X-Sender: dlang@asgard To: Linus Torvalds , "Rafael J. Wysocki" cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.25 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 1.10 (DEB 962 2008-03-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 16 Apr 2008, Linus Torvalds wrote: > It's been long promised, but there it is now. Special thanks to Ingo who > found and fixed a nasty-looking regression that turned out to not be a > regression at all, but an old bug that just had not been triggering as > reliably before. > > That said, that was just the last particular regression fix I was holding > things up for, and it's not like there weren't a lot of other fixes too, > they just didn't end up being the final things that triggered my > particular worries. Rafael, could you post the list of the remaining known regressions in 2.6.25. a few days ago there were about 2 dozen left, but there was a flurry of activity (patching, identifying some as not regressions, others as being fixed, etc) so I've lost track of what's left David Lang