From: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com>
To: Holger Kiehl <Holger.Kiehl@dwd.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org,
xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: Performance Characteristics of All Linux RAIDs (mdadm/bonnie++)
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 08:06:24 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0805290805500.17643@p34.internal.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0805290636020.20192@diagnostix.dwd.de>
On Thu, 29 May 2008, Holger Kiehl wrote:
> On Wed, 28 May 2008, Justin Piszcz wrote:
>
>> Hardware:
>>
>> Results:
>>
>> http://home.comcast.net/~jpiszcz/raid/20080528/raid-levels.html
>> http://home.comcast.net/~jpiszcz/raid/20080528/raid-levels.txt
>>
> Why is the Sequential Output (Block) for raid6 165719 and for raid5 only
> 86797? I would have thought that raid6 was always a bit slower in writting
> due to having to write double amount of parity data.
>
> Holger
>
I will re-run the RAID5 test and also run the test on a single disk and
update the results later.
Justin.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-29 12:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-28 8:53 Justin Piszcz
2008-05-28 10:54 ` Peter Rabbitson
2008-05-28 11:05 ` Justin Piszcz
2008-05-28 15:40 ` Chris Snook
2008-05-28 17:32 ` Justin Piszcz
2008-05-28 17:53 ` Justin Piszcz
2008-05-28 19:22 ` Chris Snook
2008-05-28 19:27 ` Justin Piszcz
2008-05-29 9:57 ` Kasper Sandberg
2008-05-29 21:08 ` Justin Piszcz
2008-05-28 16:34 ` Jens Bäckman
2008-05-28 16:40 ` Chris Snook
2008-05-28 16:46 ` Bryan Mesich
2008-05-28 17:33 ` Justin Piszcz
2008-05-28 18:57 ` Alan Cox
2008-05-28 23:00 ` Bill Davidsen
2008-05-29 11:22 ` Alan Cox
2008-05-30 12:22 ` Bill Davidsen
2008-05-28 19:02 ` Keld Jørn Simonsen
2008-05-28 19:05 ` Justin Piszcz
2008-05-28 23:09 ` Bill Davidsen
2008-05-29 6:37 ` Michal Soltys
2008-05-29 6:44 ` Holger Kiehl
2008-05-29 12:06 ` Justin Piszcz [this message]
2008-05-29 17:02 ` Justin Piszcz
2008-05-30 12:55 ` Bill Davidsen
2008-05-30 14:23 ` Keld Jørn Simonsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.1.10.0805290805500.17643@p34.internal.lan \
--to=jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com \
--cc=Holger.Kiehl@dwd.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®