From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757524AbZBKQde (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Feb 2009 11:33:34 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755718AbZBKQd0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Feb 2009 11:33:26 -0500 Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([71.74.56.123]:41669 "EHLO hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755607AbZBKQd0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Feb 2009 11:33:26 -0500 Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 11:33:24 -0500 (EST) From: Steven Rostedt X-X-Sender: rostedt@gandalf.stny.rr.com To: Ingo Molnar cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , Peter Zijlstra , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Frederic Weisbecker Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] git pull request for tip/tracing/core In-Reply-To: <20090211162530.GB32301@elte.hu> Message-ID: References: <20090208054955.777429253@goodmis.org> <20090209093751.GD7930@elte.hu> <20090211153650.GA19576@elte.hu> <20090211162530.GB32301@elte.hu> User-Agent: Alpine 1.10 (DEB 962 2008-03-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 11 Feb 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > > > On Wed, 11 Feb 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Steven Rostedt (7): > > > > > ring-buffer: add NMI protection for spinlocks > > > > > nmi: add generic nmi tracking state > > > > > > hm, this commit breaks a number of non-x86 architectures the following way: > > > > > > In file included from /home/mingo/tip/include/linux/interrupt.h:12, > > > from /home/mingo/tip/arch/ia64/include/asm/mca.h:16, > > > from /home/mingo/tip/arch/ia64/kernel/asm-offsets.c:17: > > > /home/mingo/tip/include/linux/hardirq.h:67:2: #error PREEMPT_ACTIVE too high! > > > make[2]: *** [arch/ia64/kernel/asm-offsets.s] Error 1 > > > > > > Alpha and ARM are broken too. (and possibly others) > > > > I'm glad we had that check. > > > > OK, revert it and I'll take a look to see what other options we have. > > Reverting it is neither simple nor desired: 1) it's now embedded in other > tracing commits 2) my test-boxes stopped doing those rare lockups with the > NMI fix in place ... OK, I was thinking about coming up with another fix. I'll have to look at the other archs and see what we can do to make this work for all. > > Any better approach to fix those platforms? I reported this ftrace NMI problem > to you about a year ago ... Yeah, and I just found the bug ;-) -- Steve