From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762388AbZBYVdB (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Feb 2009 16:33:01 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756133AbZBYVcv (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Feb 2009 16:32:51 -0500 Received: from smtp3.ultrahosting.com ([74.213.175.254]:35640 "EHLO smtp.ultrahosting.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752892AbZBYVcv (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Feb 2009 16:32:51 -0500 Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 16:23:14 -0500 (EST) From: Christoph Lameter X-X-Sender: cl@qirst.com To: Vegard Nossum cc: Pekka Enberg , mingo@elte.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] kmemcheck: Disable SLUB and SLAB debugging when kmemcheck is enabled In-Reply-To: <19f34abd0902251117h7a4a6e9ao34e972110d8b40a1@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: References: <1235381712.6216.22.camel@penberg-laptop> <1235410406.6216.69.camel@penberg-laptop> <19f34abd0902251117h7a4a6e9ao34e972110d8b40a1@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Alpine 1.10 (DEB 962 2008-03-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 25 Feb 2009, Vegard Nossum wrote: > Can you rethink whether SLUB_DEBUG or SLUB_DEBUG_ON is the one we > really want to depend on !KMEMCHECK, and either submit a new patch or > convince me that this is sufficient? !SLUB_DEBUG_ON is the right thing to depend on.