From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761246AbZDGUtg (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Apr 2009 16:49:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1760669AbZDGUtR (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Apr 2009 16:49:17 -0400 Received: from smtp.ultrahosting.com ([74.213.174.254]:37221 "EHLO smtp.ultrahosting.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1761102AbZDGUtP (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Apr 2009 16:49:15 -0400 Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 16:43:30 -0400 (EDT) From: Christoph Lameter X-X-Sender: cl@qirst.com To: Pekka Enberg cc: David Rientjes , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch] slub: default min_partial to at least highest cpus per node In-Reply-To: <49DBB929.4080205@cs.helsinki.fi> Message-ID: References: <49DBA23A.3000106@cs.helsinki.fi> <84144f020904071209j638aae9bv406661ec401af7af@mail.gmail.com> <49DBAF7E.30704@cs.helsinki.fi> <49DBB373.5050800@cs.helsinki.fi> <49DBB929.4080205@cs.helsinki.fi> User-Agent: Alpine 1.10 (DEB 962 2008-03-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I am not sure about the benefit of this. If the page allocator finally improves in performance then we can reduce the mininum number of partial slabs kept and also do pass through for all sizes >2k. Some numbers would be good to see if we should adopt this in the meantime.