From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753045AbZDUQBf (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Apr 2009 12:01:35 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754197AbZDUQBK (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Apr 2009 12:01:10 -0400 Received: from smtp.ultrahosting.com ([74.213.174.254]:41774 "EHLO smtp.ultrahosting.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753642AbZDUQBI (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Apr 2009 12:01:08 -0400 Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 11:09:59 -0400 (EDT) From: Christoph Lameter X-X-Sender: cl@qirst.com To: Mel Gorman cc: Pekka Enberg , Linux Memory Management List , KOSAKI Motohiro , Nick Piggin , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Lin Ming , Zhang Yanmin , Peter Zijlstra , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH 25/25] Use a pre-calculated value instead of num_online_nodes() in fast paths In-Reply-To: <20090421090102.GI12713@csn.ul.ie> Message-ID: References: <1240266011-11140-1-git-send-email-mel@csn.ul.ie> <1240266011-11140-26-git-send-email-mel@csn.ul.ie> <1240301300.771.58.camel@penberg-laptop> <20090421090102.GI12713@csn.ul.ie> User-Agent: Alpine 1.10 (DEB 962 2008-03-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 21 Apr 2009, Mel Gorman wrote: > On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 11:08:20AM +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote: > > On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 23:20 +0100, Mel Gorman wrote: > > > diff --git a/mm/slab.c b/mm/slab.c > > > index 1c680e8..41d1343 100644 > > > --- a/mm/slab.c > > > +++ b/mm/slab.c > > > @@ -3579,7 +3579,7 @@ static inline void __cache_free(struct kmem_cache *cachep, void *objp) > > > * variable to skip the call, which is mostly likely to be present in > > > * the cache. > > > */ > > > - if (numa_platform && cache_free_alien(cachep, objp)) > > > + if (numa_platform > 1 && cache_free_alien(cachep, objp)) > > > return; > > > > This doesn't look right. I assume you meant "nr_online_nodes > 1" here? > > If so, please go ahead and remove "numa_platform" completely. > > > > It would need to be nr_possible_nodes which would be a separate patch to add > the definition and then drop numa_platform. This change is wrong as part of > this patch. I'll drop it. Thanks nr_online_nodes would be okay as Pekka suggested.