From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+w=401wt.eu-S1758984AbZGGQQm@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1758984AbZGGQQm (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Tue, 7 Jul 2009 12:16:42 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758029AbZGGQPy
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Tue, 7 Jul 2009 12:15:54 -0400
Received: from smtp3.ultrahosting.com ([74.213.175.254]:60307 "EHLO
	smtp.ultrahosting.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1758769AbZGGQPx (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 7 Jul 2009 12:15:53 -0400
Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 12:15:29 -0400 (EDT)
From: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
X-X-Sender: cl@gentwo.org
To: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@kernel.org>
cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
       Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
       x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip V2] x86: thread_info.h moving comment to where it
 should be
In-Reply-To: <1246944088.2422.10.camel@ht.satnam>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0907071212440.5124@gentwo.org>
References: <1246879925.28541.3.camel@hpdv5.satnam>  <alpine.LFD.2.00.0907062052230.19480@localhost.localdomain>  <1246914309.2478.2.camel@ht.satnam>  <alpine.LFD.2.00.0907062321370.19480@localhost.localdomain> <1246944088.2422.10.camel@ht.satnam>
User-Agent: Alpine 1.10 (DEB 962 2008-03-14)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, 7 Jul 2009, Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote:

> Have you applied it or you only shouts like always.

Could we reduce the noise please (that applies bto both of you)?

If it helps: Blame me (since I am less involved now) but please get it
fixed.