From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756135AbZJ3Bas (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Oct 2009 21:30:48 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753111AbZJ3Bar (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Oct 2009 21:30:47 -0400 Received: from BISCAYNE-ONE-STATION.MIT.EDU ([18.7.7.80]:56535 "EHLO biscayne-one-station.mit.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753013AbZJ3Baq (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Oct 2009 21:30:46 -0400 Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 21:30:37 -0400 (EDT) From: Tim Abbott X-X-Sender: tabbott@dr-wily.mit.edu To: Greg Ungerer cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Sam Ravnborg Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 7/7] m68knommu: Split the .init section into INIT_TEXT_SECTION and INIT_DATA_SECTION. In-Reply-To: <4AEA3DC9.7080205@snapgear.com> Message-ID: References: <1255886635-17371-7-git-send-email-tabbott@ksplice.com> <4AEA3DC9.7080205@snapgear.com> User-Agent: Alpine 1.10 (DEB 962 2008-03-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.00 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 30 Oct 2009, Greg Ungerer wrote: > Hi Tim, > > The whole series applied and ran fine for me! > (Of course excepting the define name clash in 1/7) Thanks for your patience debugging this patch series! > Do you want me to push these into m68knommu.git? Yes, that'd be great. Do you expect these to end up in 2.6.32? I have an API change to INIT_DATA_SECTION that I want to put in 2.6.32 to fix a tiny regression on blackfin, and I'd like to know which change is likely to get merged first (since the API change will likely conflict). -Tim Abbott