mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 1/2] mm: change dirty limit type specifiers to unsigned long
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 11:49:00 -0800 (PST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.0811241140390.19930@chino.kir.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1227554201.4259.538.camel@twins>

On Mon, 24 Nov 2008, Peter Zijlstra wrote:

> This didn't pop up any weird and wonderfull assumptions on the
> signed-ness of these variables I take it :-)
> 

It didn't; in fact, callers already used them as though they were 
unsigned.  For example, bdi_debug_stats_show():

	seq_printf(m,
		   "BdiDirtyThresh:   %8lu kB\n"
		   "DirtyThresh:      %8lu kB\n"
		   "BackgroundThresh: %8lu kB\n",
		   K(bdi_thresh),
		   K(dirty_thresh),
		   K(background_thresh));

And get_dirty_limits() itself implicitly uses an unsigned type specifier 
for the long *pbdi_dirty limit:

	if (bdi) {
		u64 bdi_dirty;
		...
		*pbdi_dirty = bdi_dirty;
	}

And, given that the remainder of the get_dirty_limits() callers simply use 
these for comparisons to the ZVC global_page_state() values, which are 
also unsigned long, this conversion is safe.

Thanks Peter!

      reply	other threads:[~2008-11-24 19:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-11-23 18:55 David Rientjes
2008-11-23 18:55 ` [patch 2/2] mm: add dirty_background_bytes and dirty_bytes sysctls David Rientjes
2008-11-24 19:15   ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-11-24 23:38   ` Andrew Morton
2008-11-25  0:52     ` Randy Dunlap
2008-11-25  1:05       ` David Rientjes
2008-11-25  1:00     ` David Rientjes
2009-02-01  1:22   ` [PATCH] mm: Fix dirty_bytes/dirty_background_bytes sysctls on 64bit arches Sven Wegener
2009-02-01  9:19     ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-01 10:22       ` Sven Wegener
2009-02-02  0:26     ` David Rientjes
2008-11-24 19:16 ` [patch 1/2] mm: change dirty limit type specifiers to unsigned long Peter Zijlstra
2008-11-24 19:49   ` David Rientjes [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.00.0811241140390.19930@chino.kir.corp.google.com \
    --to=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®