From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754610AbZEKTdS (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 May 2009 15:33:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752504AbZEKTdA (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 May 2009 15:33:00 -0400 Received: from smtp-out.google.com ([216.239.45.13]:31779 "EHLO smtp-out.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752147AbZEKTc7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 May 2009 15:32:59 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=beta; d=google.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=date:from:x-x-sender:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id: references:user-agent:mime-version:content-type:x-system-of-record; b=djlBDQx84zO4eMb31jYI/gVrIWbO9CIsxxzhtUWmMrxeBpjLBiSmGv6vIj6zyleNL jRuHFW9W4tUQ4mfKXH+LQ== Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 12:32:54 -0700 (PDT) From: David Rientjes X-X-Sender: rientjes@chino.kir.corp.google.com To: Minchan Kim cc: Mel Gorman , Andrew Morton , Peter Zijlstra , Nick Piggin , Christoph Lameter , Dave Hansen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch -mmotm] mm: invoke oom killer for __GFP_NOFAIL In-Reply-To: <28c262360905110700p68f3de35xf0a1d52d2ccfd968@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: References: <20090511162900.f372edd1.minchan.kim@barrios-desktop> <28c262360905110212j9867b79wd8d90b16f6f196be@mail.gmail.com> <28c262360905110421g1b079f2cr798ca95adfb8ee45@mail.gmail.com> <20090511133840.GA11624@csn.ul.ie> <28c262360905110700p68f3de35xf0a1d52d2ccfd968@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-System-Of-Record: true Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 11 May 2009, Minchan Kim wrote: > But this patch increases the probability of innocent task killing. > Is GFP_NOFAIL's early bailout more important than killing of innocent task ? > __GFP_NOFAIL's bailout is, by definition, a bug in the page allocator and this patch fixes it.