From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754739AbZHQOZW (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Aug 2009 10:25:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754366AbZHQOZV (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Aug 2009 10:25:21 -0400 Received: from lucidpixels.com ([75.144.35.66]:51861 "EHLO lucidpixels.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753251AbZHQOZV (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Aug 2009 10:25:21 -0400 Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 10:25:22 -0400 (EDT) From: Justin Piszcz To: Christoph Hellwig cc: Felix Blyakher , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: Kernel 2.6.30.4 XFS(..?) regression (happened again) In-Reply-To: <20090816022331.GA2309@infradead.org> Message-ID: References: <00980BBF-1206-4BEF-A8AE-B4A8DAE7EC27@sgi.com> <20090816022331.GA2309@infradead.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 15 Aug 2009, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > All your traces seem to have in common that you're block on locks hold > by processed doing I/O. Especially a lot of page locks which are > controlled by the VM and not the filesystem. Can you try with commit > 8aa7e847d834ed937a9ad37a0f2ad5b8584c1ab0 from 2.6.31-rc applied, or > better directly 2.6.3-rc6? > > I would be surprised if this is something inside XFS, but running with > CONFIG_XFS_DEBUG never hurts. > Christoph, Thanks, running with DEBUG and 2.6.31-rc6. CONFIG_XFS_DEBUG=y So far the problem has not surfaced, but it normally takes 24-48 hours. Justin.