From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754444AbZJ1EI4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Oct 2009 00:08:56 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754268AbZJ1EIz (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Oct 2009 00:08:55 -0400 Received: from smtp-out.google.com ([216.239.33.17]:1849 "EHLO smtp-out.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751532AbZJ1EIy (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Oct 2009 00:08:54 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=beta; d=google.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=date:from:x-x-sender:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id: references:user-agent:mime-version:content-type:x-system-of-record; b=qFDiYa+ueXhVcW8wr91EUDCB36NbJNO6UICj5qlNs0jOuSwtHzX1t4BlCjHfWmsDI FPwX/RenqqiHoRN7jGDNA== Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 21:08:52 -0700 (PDT) From: David Rientjes X-X-Sender: rientjes@chino.kir.corp.google.com To: Andi Kleen cc: Mike Travis , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , Andrew Morton , Jack Steiner , "H. Peter Anvin" , x86@kernel.org, Yinghai Lu , Mel Gorman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch] x86: reduce srat verbosity in the kernel log In-Reply-To: <20091028032954.GD7744@basil.fritz.box> Message-ID: References: <20091023233743.439628000@alcatraz.americas.sgi.com> <20091023233750.702443000@alcatraz.americas.sgi.com> <87pr8ay6tc.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> <4AE710C9.2070307@sgi.com> <4AE75162.7080903@sgi.com> <4AE75B38.8070301@sgi.com> <4AE77BF6.2040201@sgi.com> <20091028032954.GD7744@basil.fritz.box> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-System-Of-Record: true Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 28 Oct 2009, Andi Kleen wrote: > >> Quite the system you have there :) What was once 760 lines has been > >> reduced to 24 without removing any information. > >> > >> This seems to be the most we can reduce this particular output since we > >> don't support mapping multiple pxms to a single node. > > > > Yes, thanks very much for the optimization. > > > > (And you can add my Acked-by or whatever you need.) > > Looks also good to me, thanks. Also Acked-by. > Thanks Andi. I'm hoping Ingo will pick this up and not have a problem with the use of NUMA_NO_NODE vs. NID_INVAL since there's a patch pending in -mm that removes the former and this saves a Linus build error when he pushes for 2.6.33 (and they are both defined the same anyway).