From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756970AbZKDQxO (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Nov 2009 11:53:14 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756329AbZKDQxN (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Nov 2009 11:53:13 -0500 Received: from lucidpixels.com ([75.144.35.66]:43638 "EHLO lucidpixels.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753372AbZKDQxN (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Nov 2009 11:53:13 -0500 Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 11:53:18 -0500 (EST) From: Justin Piszcz To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Kernel Options: To use MSI-X or not? Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello, I was curious whether its best to use MSI-X when the driver supports it or not? Example, 3ware cards/Intel Audio Drivers you can use MSI-X instead of having several devices use/share an interrupt. What are the pros/cons to using MSI-X vs. having devices share an IRQ? Justin.