From: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
To: Andreas Mohr <andi@lisas.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Nick Bowler <nbowler@elliptictech.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Improve usability in case of init binary failure
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2010 23:10:51 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1002012308480.22003@chino.kir.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091227150329.GA25711@rhlx01.hs-esslingen.de>
On Sun, 27 Dec 2009, Andreas Mohr wrote:
> Well, took quite a while longer, partly due to broken Broadcom USB host
> (OpenWrt fix to be submitted) and non-working USB-audio on nicer platforms.
>
> Took most of the comments into account (thanks!), improved some wording.
>
> Patch against current git, compile- and runtime-tested,
> checkpatch.pl'd (with a single nice hierarchy warning resulting from mixing
> git diff output and manual /dev/null diffing).
>
> Thanks!
>
It looks like this patch got mangled when added to mmotm-2010-02-01-16-25
in init-mainc-improve-usability-in-case-of-init-binary-failure.patch since
it added init.txt to the root directory instead of Documentation, even
though the patch below is correct.
> Signed-off-by: Andreas Mohr <andi@lisas.de>
>
> diff --git a/init/main.c b/init/main.c
> index dac44a9..33748c6 100644
> --- a/init/main.c
> +++ b/init/main.c
> @@ -836,7 +836,8 @@ static noinline int init_post(void)
> run_init_process("/bin/init");
> run_init_process("/bin/sh");
>
> - panic("No init found. Try passing init= option to kernel.");
> + panic("No init found. Try passing init= option to kernel. "
> + "See Linux Documentation/init.txt for guidance.");
> }
>
> static int __init kernel_init(void * unused)
> --- /dev/null 2009-12-27 16:25:29.521258205 +0100
> +++ Documentation/init.txt 2009-12-27 15:47:46.000000000 +0100
> @@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
> +Explaining the dreaded "No init found." boot hang message
> +=========================================================
> +
> +OK, so you've got this pretty unintuitive message (currently located
> +in init/main.c) and are wondering what the H*** went wrong.
> +Some high-level reasons for failure (listed roughly in order of execution)
> +to load the init binary are:
> +A) Unable to mount root FS
> +B) init binary doesn't exist on rootfs
> +C) broken console device
> +D) binary exists but dependencies not available
> +E) binary cannot be loaded
> +
> +Detailed explanations:
> +0) Set "debug" kernel parameter (in bootloader config file or CONFIG_CMDLINE)
> + to get more detailed kernel messages.
> +A) make sure you have the correct root FS type
> + (and root= kernel parameter points to the correct partition),
> + required drivers such as storage hardware (such as SCSI or USB!)
> + and filesystem (ext3, jffs2 etc.) are builtin (alternatively as modules,
> + to be pre-loaded by an initrd)
> +C) Possibly a conflict in console= setup --> initial console unavailable.
> + E.g. some serial consoles are unreliable due to serial IRQ issues (e.g.
> + missing interrupt-based configuration).
> + Try using a different console= device or e.g. netconsole= .
> +D) e.g. required library dependencies of the init binary such as
> + /lib/ld-linux.so.2 missing or broken. Use readelf -d <INIT>|grep NEEDED
> + to find out which libraries are required.
> +E) make sure the binary's architecture matches your hardware.
> + E.g. i386 vs. x86_64 mismatch, or trying to load x86 on ARM hardware.
> + In case you tried loading a non-binary file here (shell script?),
> + you should make sure that the script specifies an interpreter in its shebang
> + header line (#!/...) that is fully working (including its library
> + dependencies). And before tackling scripts, better first test a simple
> + non-script binary such as /bin/sh and confirm its successful execution.
> + To find out more, add code to init/main.c to display kernel_execve()s
> + return values.
> +
> +Please extend this explanation whenever you find new failure causes
> +(after all loading the init binary is a CRITICAL and hard transition step
> +which needs to be made as painless as possible), then submit patch to LKML.
> +Further TODOs:
> +- Implement the various run_init_process() invocations via a struct array
> + which can then store the kernel_execve() result value and on failure
> + log it all by iterating over _all_ results (very important usability fix).
> +- try to make the implementation itself more helpful in general,
> + e.g. by providing additional error messages at affected places.
> +
> +Andreas Mohr <andi at lisas period de>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-02 7:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-16 19:40 [PATCH] FIX IT Andreas Mohr
2009-11-16 20:35 ` Nick Bowler
2009-11-17 20:40 ` Andreas Mohr
2009-12-27 15:03 ` [PATCH] Improve usability in case of init binary failure Andreas Mohr
2010-02-02 7:10 ` David Rientjes [this message]
2010-02-02 17:20 ` Andrew Morton
2010-02-02 17:48 ` Andreas Mohr
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.00.1002012308480.22003@chino.kir.corp.google.com \
--to=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi@lisas.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nbowler@elliptictech.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®