From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760485Ab0FQRm2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Jun 2010 13:42:28 -0400 Received: from smtp.eu.citrix.com ([62.200.22.115]:57624 "EHLO SMTP.EU.CITRIX.COM" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756923Ab0FQRm1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Jun 2010 13:42:27 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.53,432,1272844800"; d="scan'208";a="465050" Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 18:40:00 +0100 From: Stefano Stabellini X-X-Sender: sstabellini@kaball-desktop To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk CC: Stefano Stabellini , "jeremy@goop.org" , "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "ddutile@redhat.com" , "sheng@linux.intel.com" Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 03/12] evtchn delivery on HVM In-Reply-To: <20100617173817.GA17523@phenom.dumpdata.com> Message-ID: References: <1275570645-27189-1-git-send-email-stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com> <1275570645-27189-3-git-send-email-stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com> <20100614212040.GC8600@phenom.dumpdata.com> <20100617173817.GA17523@phenom.dumpdata.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 17 Jun 2010, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > /* vector callbacks are better than PCI interrupts to receive event > ^V > > * channel notifications because we can receive vector callbacks on any > > * vcpu and we don't need PCI support or APIC interactions */ > ^. > > > > is it good enough? > Just two things.. > Ok