From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751782Ab0JKEuW (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Oct 2010 00:50:22 -0400 Received: from x35.xmailserver.org ([64.71.152.41]:57185 "EHLO x35.xmailserver.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750791Ab0JKEuV (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Oct 2010 00:50:21 -0400 X-AuthUser: davidel@xmailserver.org Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2010 21:49:58 -0700 (PDT) From: Davide Libenzi X-X-Sender: davide@davide-laptop To: Robin Holt cc: "Eric W. Biederman" , Pekka Enberg , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [Patch] Convert max_user_watches to long. In-Reply-To: <20101009075002.GW14068@sgi.com> Message-ID: References: <20101001200143.GR14064@sgi.com> <20101004194411.GT14068@sgi.com> <20101009075002.GW14068@sgi.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23) X-GPG-FINGRPRINT: CFAE 5BEE FD36 F65E E640 56FE 0974 BF23 270F 474E X-GPG-PUBLIC_KEY: http://www.xmailserver.org/davidel.asc MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 9 Oct 2010, Robin Holt wrote: > @@ -900,11 +902,12 @@ static int ep_insert(struct eventpoll *e > { > int error, revents, pwake = 0; > unsigned long flags; > + long user_watches; > struct epitem *epi; > struct ep_pqueue epq; > > - if (unlikely(atomic_read(&ep->user->epoll_watches) >= > - max_user_watches)) > + user_watches = atomic_long_read(&ep->user->epoll_watches); > + if (user_watches >= max_user_watches) > return -ENOSPC; Is there a particular reason for adding an extra, otherwise unused, user_watches variable? - Davide