From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751783Ab0JSRwP (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Oct 2010 13:52:15 -0400 Received: from smtp.ctxuk.citrix.com ([62.200.22.115]:20267 "EHLO SMTP.EU.CITRIX.COM" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751063Ab0JSRwO (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Oct 2010 13:52:14 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.57,351,1283731200"; d="scan'208";a="2419373" Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 18:51:47 +0100 From: Stefano Stabellini X-X-Sender: sstabellini@kaball-desktop To: Stephen Rothwell CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , linux-next@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: xen PV on HVM and initial domain merge in linux-next In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I forgot to CC the LKML and linux-next... On Tue, 19 Oct 2010, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > Stephen, > I have two patch series to merge in linux-next: > > PV on HVM: receive interrupts as xen events > xen: initial domain support > > they have all the acked-by needed and are both stable since several > weeks, however they depend on Konrad's xen-pcifront series and for this > reason I waited until now to ask for a merge in linux-next. > > Could you please pull: > > git://xenbits.xen.org/people/sstabellini/linux-pvhvm.git linux-next-initial-domain-v4 > > it contains both series rebased on Konrad's pcifront series merged on > linux-next (warning: it still contains the merge commit of > xen-pcifront-0.8.2 in linux-next). > Let me know if you have any conflicts or if you need me to change the > branch somehow. > > Many thanks in advance, > > Stefano Stabellini >