From: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com>
To: "Ian E. Morgan" <penguin.wrangler@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-net@vger.kernel.org,
Alan Piszcz <ap@solarrain.com>
Subject: Re: Only ~85MiB/s (e1000e/write) to ~310MiB/s RAID-0 on ATOM board?
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 14:08:11 -0500 (EST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1101161402430.29729@p34.internal.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimMz9xgVB2njxvKEe=CXrvig_1wTc1g7keTHZp1@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, 16 Jan 2011, Ian E. Morgan wrote:
> Justin,
>
> I have two Supermicro 5015a-EHF-D525's. They use the same Intel 82574L
> NICs as your slightly older board.
> I asked myself the same questions as you just recently, and my
> research into multi-queue NIC support led to:
>
> Receive Packet Steering
>
> Take a look at the output of NET_TX and NET_RX in /proc/softirq.
> The interrupts were not balanced across the cpus until I did:
>
> echo f > /sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1c.1/0000:02:00.0/net/eth0/queues/rx-0/rps_cpus
> ("f" being a bitmask of cpus)
>
> Then the interrupts started balancing across all cpus.
> I haven't had a chance to try this in a high throughput transfer
> situation yet, as I just happened to look into this last night.
>
> Hope it leads you down the right path, and please let me know if it
> does or doesn't help, or any other solutions you've found or come up
> with.
>
> --
> Ian Morgan
Hi Ian,
Thanks for the response & suggestion!
Tried it on kernel 2.6.37:
Made sure it was enabled:
# grep RPS .config
CONFIG_RPS=y
Only achieved 79.98M/s on > 4 GB of data via FTP (downloading), does not
appear to change much.
# cat /sys/class/net/eth1/queues/rx-0/rps_cpus
0
# echo f > /sys/class/net/eth1/queues/rx-0/rps_cpus
# cat /sys/class/net/eth1/queues/rx-0/rps_cpus
f
#
# cat /proc/softirqs
CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 CPU3
HI: 0 0 0 0
TIMER: 508490 507869 508325 508253
NET_TX: 22933 24274 23800 22124
NET_RX: 94412 218903 93273 95787
BLOCK: 63945 22646 21324 8084
BLOCK_IOPOLL: 0 0 0 0
TASKLET: 8 4 2 5
SCHED: 244572 218617 262071 242491
HRTIMER: 0 0 0 0
RCU: 52859 53519 53715 55199
What speed(s) do you achieve with the D525s?
If anyone finds out why these boards cannot achieve > 90-100MiB/s to disk,
I'd be curious to know why, thanks.
Justin.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-16 19:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-07 20:18 Justin Piszcz
2011-01-16 18:49 ` Ian E. Morgan
2011-01-16 19:08 ` Justin Piszcz [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.00.1101161402430.29729@p34.internal.lan \
--to=jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com \
--cc=ap@solarrain.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-net@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=penguin.wrangler@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®